ArticlePhysiological reports2022
Label-free imaging of non-deparaffinized sections of the human kidney to determine tissue quality and signatures of disease.
Article in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nonlinear Microscopy of ECM Remodeling in Renal and Vascular Tissues: A Systematic Review Integrating Human AVF Imaging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Classification of collagen remodeling in asthma using second-harmonic generation imaging, supervised machine learning and texture-based analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Label-free optical imaging of cell function and collagen structure for cell-based therapies.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Label-free imaging of non-deparaffinized sections of the human kidney to determine tissue quality and signatures of disease.Physiological reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Label-free fluorescence imaging of kidney sections can provide important morphological information, but its utility has not been tested in a histology processing workflow. We tested the feasibility of label-free imaging of paraffin-embedded sections without deparaffinization and its potential usefulness in generating actionable data. Kidney tissue specimens were obtained during percutaneous nephrolithotomy or via diagnostic needle biopsy. Unstained non-deparaffinized sections were imaged using widefield fluorescence microscopy to capture endogenous fluorescence. Some samples were also imaged with confocal microscopy and multiphoton excitation to collect second harmonic generation (SHG) signal to obtain high-quality autofluorescence images with optical sectioning. To adjudicate the label-free signal, the samples or corresponding contiguous sections were subsequently deparaffinized and stained with Lillie's allochrome. Label-free imaging allowed the recognition of various kidney structures and enabled morphological qualification for adequacy. SHG and confocal imaging yielded quantifiable high-quality images for tissue collagens and revealed specific patterns in glomeruli and various tubules. Disease specimens from patients with diabetic kidney disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis showed distinctive signatures compared to specimens from healthy controls with normal kidney function. Quantitative cytometry could also be performed when DAPI is added in situ before imaging. These results show that label-free imaging of non-deparaffinized sections provides useful information about tissue quality that could be beneficial to nephropathologists by maximizing the use of scarce kidney tissue. This approach also provides quantifiable features that could inform on the biology of health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.