Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133072›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2022

Risk factors for RhD immunisation in a high coverage prevention programme of antenatal and postnatal RhIg: a nationwide cohort study.

Y M Slootweg, C Zwiers, J M Koelewijn, E van der Schoot, D Oepkes, I L van Kamp, M de Haas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence of Alloimmunization and Associated Risk Factors among Antenatal Women in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Review
  4. IgG-Fc Glycosylation and a Novel Flowcytometric Assay to Predict Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y M SlootwegDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8209-7237
C ZwiersDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5844-6142
J M KoelewijnCentre for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0532-0022
E van der SchootCentre for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8065-3540
D OepkesDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-1532
I L van KampDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7856-3397
M de HaasCentre for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-0525
Leiden University Medical Center · NLSanquin · NL

Funding

Stichting Sanquin Bloedvoorziening PPOD 14-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate which risk factors for RhD immunisation remain, despite adequate routine antenatal and postnatal RhIg prophylaxis (1000 IU RhIg) and additional administration of RhIg. The second objective was assessment of the current prevalence of RhD immunisations.

designProspective cohort study.

settingThe Netherlands. POPULATION: Two-year nationwide cohort of alloimmunised RhD-negative women.

methodsRhD-negative women in their first RhD immunised pregnancy were included for risk factor analysis. We compared risk factors for RhD immunisation, occurring either in the previous non-immunised pregnancy or in the index pregnancy, with national population data derived from the Dutch perinatal registration (Perined).

resultsIn the 2-year cohort, data from 193 women were eligible for analysis. Significant risk factors in women previously experiencing a pregnancy of an RhD-positive child (n = 113) were: caesarean section (CS) (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6), perinatal death (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-10.9), gestational age >42 weeks (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.2-16.6), postnatal bleeding (>1000 ml) (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6), manual removal of the placenta (MRP) (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.0-9.3); these factors often occurred in combination. The miscarriage rate was significantly higher than in the Dutch population (35% versus 12.-5%, P < 0.001).

conclusionComplicated deliveries, including cases of major bleeding and surgical interventions (CS, MRP), must be recognised as a risk factor, requiring estimation of fetomaternal haemorrhage volume and adjustment of RhIg dosing. The higher miscarriage rate suggests that existing RhIg protocols need adjustment or better compliance. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Complicated delivery (caesarean section, manual removal placenta, major bleeding) is the most valid risk factor for RhD immunization despite antenatal and postnatal RhIg.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousRh IsoimmunizationCesarean SectionChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunizationInfantPregnancyProspective StudiesRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRho(D) Immune GlobulinRisk FactorsRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRho(D) Immune Globulinalloimmunisationfoetal medicineimmunologyscreeningserum

Identifiers

PMID35133072
PMCPMC9543810
OpenAlexW4210899519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.