Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133005›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

Implementation of a large-scale breast cancer early detection program in a resource-constrained setting: real-world experiences from 2 large states in India.

Somesh Kumar, Gulnoza Usmanova, Tapas Sadasivan Nair, Vineet Kumar Srivastava, Rakesh Singh, Nochiketa Mohanty, Nadeem Akhtar, Meshach Sunny Kujur, Ashish Kumar Srivastava, Suranjeen Prasad Pallipamula and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Somesh KumarJhpiego, New Delhi, India.
Gulnoza UsmanovaMonitoring, Evaluation and Research, Jhpiego, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7733-6264
Tapas Sadasivan NairMonitoring, Evaluation and Research, Jhpiego, New Delhi, India.
Vineet Kumar SrivastavaPrograms, Noncommunicable Diseases, Jhpiego, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh SinghMonitoring, Evaluation and Research, Jhpiego, Lucknow, India.
Nochiketa MohantyPrograms, Noncommunicable Diseases, Jhpiego, Bhubaneshwar, India.
Nadeem AkhtarNoncommunicable Diseases Unit, National Health Mission, Lucknow, India.
Meshach Sunny KujurPrograms, Noncommunicable Diseases, Jhpiego, Ranchi, India.
Ashish Kumar SrivastavaPrograms, Noncommunicable Diseases, Jhpiego, New Delhi, India.
Suranjeen Prasad PallipamulaPrograms, Noncommunicable Diseases, Jhpiego, Guwahati, India.
Gaurav AgarwalSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Amresh Bahadur SinghNoncommunicable Diseases Unit, National Health Mission, Lucknow, India.
Vivek KashyapRajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, India.
Maura McCarthyCorporate and Foundation Partnerships, Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland.
Erica J LiebermannDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Ophira GinsburgDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
New York University · USRajendra Institute of Medical Sciences · INResearch Design And Standards Organization · INSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Breast Health Initiative (BHI) was launched to demonstrate a scalable model to improve access to early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

methodsA package of evidence-based interventions was codesigned and implemented with the stakeholders, as part of the national noncommunicable disease program, through the existing primary health care system. Data from the first 18 months of the BHI are presented.

resultsA total of 108,112 women received breast health education; 48% visited the health facilities for clinical breast examination (CBE), 3% had a positive CBE result, and 41% were referred to a diagnostic facility. The concordance of CBE findings between health care providers and adherence to follow-up care improved considerably, with more women visiting the diagnostic facilities and completing diagnostic evaluation within 1 month from initial screening, and with only 9% lost to follow-up. The authors observed a clinically meaningful decrease in time to complete diagnostic evaluation with biopsy, from 37 to 9 days.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a large-scale, decentralized breast cancer early detection program delivered through the existing primary health care system in India.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth EducationHumansIndiaMass ScreeningReferral and Consultationbreast cancerdiagnosisearly detectionimplementationIndia

Identifiers

PMID35133005
PMCPMC9303860
OpenAlexW4210890482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.