Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35132893›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2022

Exact Number Concepts Are Limited to the Verbal Count Range.

Benjamin Pitt, Edward Gibson, Steven T Piantadosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diverse mathematical knowledge among indigenous Amazonians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mathematics anxiety in deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing college students.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin PittDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.ORCID 0000-0002-4912-5627
Edward GibsonDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Steven T PiantadosiDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.

Funding

Origins and Logic of Counting AlgorithmsR01HD085996 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CANTLON, JESSICA F · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD085996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous findings suggest that mentally representing exact numbers larger than four depends on a verbal count routine (e.g., "one, two, three . . ."). However, these findings are controversial because they rely on comparisons across radically different languages and cultures. We tested the role of language in number concepts within a single population-the Tsimane' of Bolivia-in which knowledge of number words varies across individual adults. We used a novel data-analysis model to quantify the point at which participants (

Indexed as

CognitionLanguageAdultHumansLanguage DevelopmentMathematicscognitioncross-cultural differenceslanguagenumber comprehensionopen data

Identifiers

PMID35132893
PMCPMC9096449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.