Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35132556›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2022

Naloxone Co-Dispensing with Opioids: a Cluster Randomized Pragmatic Trial.

Ingrid A Binswanger, Deborah Rinehart, Shane R Mueller, Komal J Narwaney, Melanie Stowell, Nicole Wagner, Stan Xu, Rebecca Hanratty, Josh Blum, Kevin McVaney and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03337100 (The Impact of Co-Dispensing Naloxone to Patients Prescribed Chronic Opioid Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03337100 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Co-Dispensing Naloxone to Patients Prescribed Chronic Opioid Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2017 to 2022Enrolled7ConditionsOverdose, Risk BehaviorArmsCo-Dispensing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Price Sensitivity and Information Barriers to the Take-Up of Naloxone.American economic journal. Economic policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ingrid A BinswangerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. ingrid.a.binswanger@kp.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8862-8078
Deborah RinehartDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Shane R MuellerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Komal J NarwaneyInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Melanie StowellDenver Health, Center for Health Systems Research, Office of Research, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA.
Nicole WagnerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Stan XuDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Rebecca HanrattyDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Josh BlumDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kevin McVaneyDepartment of Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Jason M GlanzInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
The Safety and Impact of Expanded Access to Naloxone in Health SystemsR01DA042059 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BINSWANGER, INGRID A, GLANZ, JASON M · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough naloxone prevents opioid overdose deaths, few patients prescribed opioids receive naloxone, limiting its effectiveness in real-world settings. Barriers to naloxone prescribing include concerns that naloxone could increase risk behavior and limited time to provide necessary patient education.

objectiveTo determine whether pharmacy-based naloxone co-dispensing affected opioid risk behavior. Secondary objectives were to assess if co-dispensing increased naloxone acquisition, increased patient knowledge about naloxone administration, and affected opioid dose and other substance use.

designCluster randomized pragmatic trial of naloxone co-dispensing.

settingSafety-net health system in Denver, Colorado, between 2017 and 2020.

participantsSeven pharmacies were randomized. Pharmacy patients (N=768) receiving opioids were followed using automated data for 10 months. Pharmacy patients were also invited to complete surveys at baseline, 4 months, and 8 months; 325 survey participants were enrolled from November 15, 2017, to January 8, 2019.

interventionIntervention pharmacies implemented workflows to co-dispense naloxone while usual care pharmacies provided usual services. MAIN MEASURES: Survey instruments assessed opioid risk behavior; hazardous drinking; tobacco, cannabis, and other drug use; and knowledge. Naloxone dispensings and opioid dose were evaluated using pharmacy data among pharmacy patients and survey participants. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted using generalized linear mixed models accounting for clustering at the pharmacy level. KEY

resultsOpioid risk behavior did not differ by trial group (P=0.52; 8-month vs. baseline adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.07; 95% CI 0.78, 1.47). Compared with usual care pharmacies, naloxone dispensings were higher in intervention pharmacies (ARR 3.38; 95% CI 2.21, 5.15) and participant knowledge increased (P=0.02; 8-month vs. baseline adjusted mean difference 1.05; 95% CI 0.06, 2.04). There was no difference in other substance use by the trial group.

conclusionCo-dispensing naloxone with opioids effectively increased naloxone receipt and knowledge but did not increase self-reported risk behavior.

trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov ; Identifier: NCT03337100.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersPharmaciesAnalgesics, OpioidHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsPharmacistsAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsnaloxoneoverdoseprescription opioidsrisk compensationsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID35132556
PMCPMC9411391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.