Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35132510›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2022

The Spectral Extent of Phasic Suppression of Loudness and Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions by Infrasound and Low-Frequency Tones.

Carlos Jurado, Man Yui Pat Chow, Ka Man Lydia Leung, Marcelo Larrea, Juan Vizuete, Alain de Cheveigné, Torsten Marquardt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Carlos JuradoUCL Ear Institute, London, WC1X8EE, UK.
Man Yui Pat ChowUCL Ear Institute, London, WC1X8EE, UK.
Ka Man Lydia LeungUCL Ear Institute, London, WC1X8EE, UK.
Marcelo LarreaEscuela de Ingeniería en Sonido y Acústica, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, EC170125, Ecuador.
Juan VizueteEscuela de Ingeniería en Sonido y Acústica, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, EC170125, Ecuador.
Alain de CheveignéUCL Ear Institute, London, WC1X8EE, UK.
Torsten MarquardtUCL Ear Institute, London, WC1X8EE, UK. t.marquardt@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7285-2849
Universidad de Las Américas · ECUniversity College London · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUK Dementia Research Institute · GB

Funding

European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research 15HLT03 Ears II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the effect of a biasing tone close to 5, 15, or 30 Hz on the response to higher-frequency probe tones, behaviorally, and by measuring distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The amplitude of the biasing tone was adjusted for criterion suppression of cubic DPOAE elicited by probe tones presented between 0.7 and 8 kHz, or criterion loudness suppression of a train of tone-pip probes in the range 0.125-8 kHz. For DPOAEs, the biasing-tone level for criterion suppression increased with probe-tone frequency by 8-9 dB/octave, consistent with an apex-to-base gradient of biasing-tone-induced basilar membrane displacement, as we verified by computational simulation. In contrast, the biasing-tone level for criterion loudness suppression increased with probe frequency by only 1-3 dB/octave, reminiscent of previously published data on low-side suppression of auditory nerve responses to characteristic frequency tones. These slopes were independent of biasing-tone frequency, but the biasing-tone sensation level required for criterion suppression was ~ 10 dB lower for the two infrasound biasing tones than for the 30-Hz biasing tone. On average, biasing-tone sensation levels as low as 5 dB were sufficient to modulate the perception of higher frequency sounds. Our results are relevant for recent debates on perceptual effects of environmental noise with very low-frequency content and might offer insight into the mechanism underlying low-side suppression.

Indexed as

CochleaOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousAcoustic StimulationBasilar MembraneNoiseSoundbiasingcochlear mechanicshuman cochleainfrasoundlow-frequency hearing

Identifiers

PMID35132510
PMCPMC8964881
OpenAlexW4210939599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.