ReviewMikrochimica acta2022
Electrochemical nanobiosensors equipped with peptides: a review.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a multiplex serological assay to detect immunoreactivity against a novelMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Ultrasensitive Peptide-Based Electrochemical Biosensor for Universal Diagnostic of Dengue.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Impedimetric Sensor for SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Detection: Performance Assessment with an ACE2 Peptide-Mimic/Graphite Interface.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Biomedical applications of graphene-based nanomaterials: recent progress, challenges, and prospects in highly sensitive biosensors.Discover nano · 2024Review
- Hybrid Impedimetric Biosensors for Express Protein Markers Detection.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Review
- Detecting the PEX Like Domain of Matrix Metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14) with Therapeutic Conjugated CNTs.Biosensors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent research in the field of electrochemical biosensors equipped with peptides and nanomaterials have been categorized, reviewed, and critically analyzed. Indeed, using these innovative biosensors can revolutionize biomedical diagnostics in the future. Saving lives, time, and money in this field will be considered as some main benefits of this type of diagnosis. Here, these biosensors have been categorized and evaluated in four main sections. In the first section, the focus is on investigating the types of electrochemical peptide-based nanobiosensors applied to detect pathogenic microorganisms, microbial toxins, and viruses. In the second section, due to the importance of rapid diagnosis and prognosis of various cancers, the electrochemical peptide-based nanobiosensors designed to detect cancer biomarkers have been reviewed and analyzed. In the third section, the electrochemical peptide-based nanobiosensors, which were applied to detect the essential and effective biomolecules in the various diseases, and health control, including enzymes, hormones, biomarkers, and other biomolecules, have been considered. Finally, using a comprehensive analysis, all the used elements in these biosensors have been presented as conceptual diagrams that can effectively guide researchers in future developments. The essential factors in evaluating and analyzing these electrochemical peptide-based nanobiosensors such as analyte, peptide sequence, functional groups interacted between the peptide sequences and other biosensing components, the applied nanomaterials, diagnostic techniques, detection range, and limit of detection have also been included. Other analyzable items such as the type of used redox marker and the location of the peptide sequence against the signal transducer were also considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35132460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.