Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35132449›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Development and validation of a deep learning-based algorithm for colonoscopy quality assessment.

Yuan-Yen Chang, Pai-Chi Li, Ruey-Feng Chang, Yu-Yao Chang, Siou-Ping Huang, Yang-Yuan Chen, Wen-Yen Chang, Hsu-Heng Yen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Quality of Colonoscopy].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuan-Yen ChangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pai-Chi LiGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ruey-Feng ChangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Yao ChangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Siou-Ping HuangDivision of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Yang-Yuan ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Wen-Yen ChangDepartment of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsu-Heng YenArtificial Intelligence Development Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan. 91646@cch.org.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-2245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality indicators should be assessed and monitored to improve colonoscopy quality in clinical practice. Endoscopists must enter relevant information in the endoscopy reporting system to facilitate data collection, which may be inaccurate. The current study aimed to develop a full deep learning-based algorithm to identify and analyze intra-procedural colonoscopy quality indicators based on endoscopy images obtained during the procedure.

methodsA deep learning system for classifying colonoscopy images for quality assurance purposes was developed and its performance was assessed with an independent dataset. The system was utilized to analyze captured images and results were compared with those of real-world reports.

resultsIn total, 10,417 images from the hospital endoscopy database and 3157 from Hyper-Kvasir open dataset were utilized to develop the quality assurance algorithm. The overall accuracy of the algorithm was 96.72% and that of the independent test dataset was 94.71%. Moreover, 761 real-world reports and colonoscopy images were analyzed. The accuracy of electronic reports about cecal intubation rate was 99.34% and that of the algorithm was 98.95%. The agreement rate for the assessment of polypectomy rates using the electronic reports and the algorithm was 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.83-0.90). A good correlation was found between the withdrawal time calculated using the algorithm and that entered by the physician (correlation coefficient r = 0.959, p < 0.0001).

conclusionWe proposed a novel deep learning-based algorithm that used colonoscopy images for quality assurance purposes. This model can be used to automatically assess intra-procedural colonoscopy quality indicators in clinical practice.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyDeep LearningAlgorithmsCecumDatabases, FactualHumansColonColonoscopy qualityDeep learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.