ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Development and validation of a deep learning-based algorithm for colonoscopy quality assessment.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Net Withdrawal Time and Colonoscopy Video Summarization Using Deep Learning Based Automated Temporal Video Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- [Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Quality of Colonoscopy].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
- Advancing Colorectal Cancer Diagnostics from Barium Enema to AI-Assisted Colonoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Coloproctology: A Review of Emerging Technologies and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Assisted documentation as a new focus for artificial intelligence in endoscopy: the precedent of reliable withdrawal time and image reporting.Endoscopy · 2023Article
- Public Imaging Datasets of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Artificial Intelligence: a Review.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Review
- Automated colonoscopy withdrawal phase duration estimation using cecum detection and surgical tasks classification.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Where do we stand in AI for endoscopic image analysis? Deciphering gaps and future directions.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- An Improved Endoscopic Automatic Classification Model for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using Deep Learning Integrated Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Adverse Events of Different Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Methods: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine-Learning Algorithm for Predicting Fatty Liver Disease in a Taiwanese Population.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Forrest Classification for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A New Look at the Old Endoscopic Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Current and future implications of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality indicators should be assessed and monitored to improve colonoscopy quality in clinical practice. Endoscopists must enter relevant information in the endoscopy reporting system to facilitate data collection, which may be inaccurate. The current study aimed to develop a full deep learning-based algorithm to identify and analyze intra-procedural colonoscopy quality indicators based on endoscopy images obtained during the procedure.
methodsA deep learning system for classifying colonoscopy images for quality assurance purposes was developed and its performance was assessed with an independent dataset. The system was utilized to analyze captured images and results were compared with those of real-world reports.
resultsIn total, 10,417 images from the hospital endoscopy database and 3157 from Hyper-Kvasir open dataset were utilized to develop the quality assurance algorithm. The overall accuracy of the algorithm was 96.72% and that of the independent test dataset was 94.71%. Moreover, 761 real-world reports and colonoscopy images were analyzed. The accuracy of electronic reports about cecal intubation rate was 99.34% and that of the algorithm was 98.95%. The agreement rate for the assessment of polypectomy rates using the electronic reports and the algorithm was 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.83-0.90). A good correlation was found between the withdrawal time calculated using the algorithm and that entered by the physician (correlation coefficient r = 0.959, p < 0.0001).
conclusionWe proposed a novel deep learning-based algorithm that used colonoscopy images for quality assurance purposes. This model can be used to automatically assess intra-procedural colonoscopy quality indicators in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35132449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.