Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35132399›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2022

The dawn of digital public health in Europe: Implications for public health policy and practice.

Brian Li Han Wong, Laura Maaß, Alice Vodden, Robin van Kessel, Sebastiano Sorbello, Stefan Buttigieg, Anna Odone, European Public Health Association (EUPHA) Digital Health Section

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Indirect, machine learning-based suicide risk screening: Evidence from cross-National Validation.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  15. Digital paradigm of public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brian Li Han WongSecretariat, The Lancet and Financial Times Commission on Governing Health Futures 2030: Growing up in a digital world, Global Health Centre, The Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laura MaaßDigital Health Section, European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alice VoddenDigital Health Section, European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Robin van KesselDepartment of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sebastiano SorbelloDigital Health Section, European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan ButtigiegDigital Health Section, European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anna OdoneDigital Health Section, European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
European Public Health Association (EUPHA) Digital Health Section

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of digital health technologies and the role of effective surveillance systems. While recent events have accelerated progress towards the expansion of digital public health (DPH), there remains significant untapped potential in harnessing, leveraging, and repurposing digital technologies for public health. There is a particularly growing need for comprehensive action to prepare citizens for DPH, to regulate and effectively evaluate DPH, and adopt DPH strategies as part of health policy and services to optimise health systems improvement. As representatives of the European Public Health Association's (EUPHA) Digital Health Section, we reflect on the current state of DPH, share our understanding at the European level, and determine how the application of DPH has developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also discuss the opportunities, challenges, and implications of the increasing digitalisation of public health in Europe.

Indexed as

Digital healthDigital public healthDigital transformationsDPH, Digital public healthEUPHA, European Public Health AssociationEuropeGDPR, General Data Protection RegulationICT, Information and communications technologiesNHS, National Health ServicePHWF, Public health workforcePublic healthRCT, Randomised control trialUHC, Universal health coverageUK, United KingdomUNICEF/ERACO, United Nations Children’s Fund/Europe and Central Asia Regional OfficeUN, United NationsWHO, World Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID35132399
PMCPMC8811486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.