Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35132175›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022

NIPT and the concerns regarding 'routinisation'.

Ruth Horn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Attitudes About NIPT Routinisation: A Report from a Qualitative Study of 20 UK Healthcare Professionals.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Should the scope of NIPT be limited by a 'threshold of seriousness'?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What's new in genetics in June 2022?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ruth HornThe Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. ruth.horn@ethox.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-3905

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203132/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomyPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35132175
PMCPMC9177732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.