ArticleScientific reports2022
A deep learning model to detect novel pore-forming proteins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial pore-forming toxins: mechanisms and implications for host immunity.Bioscience reports · 2026Review
- The Contribution of Human Antimicrobial Peptides to Fungi.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many pore-forming proteins originating from pathogenic bacteria are toxic against agricultural pests. They are the key ingredients in several pesticidal products for agricultural use, including transgenic crops. There is an urgent need to identify novel pore-forming proteins to combat development of resistance in pests to existing products, and to develop products that are effective against a broader range of pests. Existing computational methodologies to search for these proteins rely on sequence homology-based approaches. These approaches are based on similarities between protein sequences, and thus are limited in their usefulness for discovering novel proteins. In this paper, we outline a novel deep learning model trained on pore-forming proteins from the public domain. We compare different ways of encoding protein information during training, and contrast it with traditional approaches. We show that our model is capable of identifying known pore formers with no sequence similarity to the proteins used to train the model, and therefore holds promise for identifying novel pore formers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.