Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35132080›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

Identifying schizophrenia stigma on Twitter: a proof of principle model using service user supervised machine learning.

Sagar Jilka, Clarissa Mary Odoi, Janet van Bilsen, Daniel Morris, Sinan Erturk, Nicholas Cummins, Matteo Cella, Til Wykes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sagar JilkaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. sagar.jilka@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1578-9350
Clarissa Mary OdoiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Janet van BilsenInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Daniel MorrisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sinan ErturkInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8789-1250
Nicholas CumminsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Matteo CellaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Til WykesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5881-8003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stigma has negative effects on people with mental health problems by making them less likely to seek help. We develop a proof of principle service user supervised machine learning pipeline to identify stigmatising tweets reliably and understand the prevalence of public schizophrenia stigma on Twitter. A service user group advised on the machine learning model evaluation metric (fewest false negatives) and features for machine learning. We collected 13,313 public tweets on schizophrenia between January and May 2018. Two service user researchers manually identified stigma in 746 English tweets; 80% were used to train eight models, and 20% for testing. The two models with fewest false negatives were compared in two service user validation exercises, and the best model used to classify all extracted public English tweets. Tweets classed as stigmatising by service users were more negative in sentiment (t (744) = 12.02, p < 0.001 [95% CI: 0.196-0.273]). Our linear Support Vector Machine was the best performing model with fewest false negatives and higher service user validation. This model identified public stigma in 47% of English tweets (n5,676) which were more negative in sentiment (t (12,143) = 64.38, p < 0.001 [95% CI: 0.29-0.31]). Machine learning can identify stigmatising tweets at large scale, with service user involvement. Given the prevalence of stigma, there is an urgent need for education and online campaigns to reduce it. Machine learning can provide a real time metric on their success.

Identifiers

PMID35132080
PMCPMC8821670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.