ReviewSpinal cord series and cases2022
Does computed tomography-guided percutaneous catheter drainage is effective for spinal tuberculous abscess: a midterm results.
Review in Spinal cord series and cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage in the treatment of tuberculous psoas abscesses.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Computerized tomography-guided therapeutic percutaneous puncture catheter drainage-combined with somatostatin for severe acute pancreatitis: An analysis of efficacy and safety.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-guided anteroposterior percutaneous catheter drainage for the treatment of psoas abscess: A case series.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To evaluate an effectiveness and report a midterm clinical outcome in pain and neurological status in spinal tuberculous abscess after treated by CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spinal tuberculosis is one of the destructive forms of tuberculosis infection, which can cause undesirable consequences. The gold standard of surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis with tuberculous abscess is radical debridement, abscess drainage, and bone grafting of the defect via anterior approach. However, this treatment may lead to several serious complications. CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage is an alternative procedure for this condition and may reduce the serious complications from standard surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe medical record of the patients with spinal tuberculosis with tuberculous abscess who underwent CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage (CT-guided PCD) from 2015 to 2021. The visual analog pain scale (VAS), Frankel grading scale, duration of drainage, amount of spinal tuberculous abscess, and complications were evaluated.
resultsTwenty-nine patients (mean age 44 years old) were included in the study. All patients were followed up for 24 to 72 months with an average of 36 months. Level involvements were mostly found in L1-L2 followed by L2-L3 and T12-L1 levels. A 14-Fr catheter was the mostly use followed by 16-Fr catheter. Amount of abscess drainage ranged from 110 to 2,490 ml (mean 599 ml). The drainage duration ranged from 6 to 42 days (mean 17 days). Additional surgery was performed in three patients due to subsequent mechanical instability developed despite successful drainage of abscess. At the last follow-up, VAS, Frankel grading scale were improved significantly in all patients without complications.
conclusionsCT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage is a safe and effective alternative procedure in the treatment of spinal tuberculous abscess patients with high success rate, less complications, and satisfied midterm outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.