Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131882›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2022

A Predictive Model of Noncardia Gastric Adenocarcinoma Risk Using Antibody Response to Helicobacter pylori Proteins and Pepsinogen.

John D Murphy, Andrew F Olshan, Feng-Chang Lin, Melissa A Troester, Hazel B Nichols, Julia Butt, You-Lin Qiao, Christian C Abnet, Manami Inoue, Shoichiro Tsugane and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cancer Progress and Priorities: Gastric Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

John D MurphyDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-9976
Andrew F OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Feng-Chang LinDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Melissa A TroesterDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Hazel B NicholsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0972-1560
Julia ButtDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7738-8611
You-Lin QiaoChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Center for Global Health, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6380-0871
Christian C AbnetDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3008-7843
Manami InoueEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1276-2398
Shoichiro TsuganeEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4105-2774
Meira EppleinDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5646-6430
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USPrevention Group · USCancer Genetics (United States) · USChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNClinical Research Institute · USDKFZ-ZMBH Alliance · DE

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHARLES M PEROU · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Nutrition Intervention Trials in Linxian ChinaZIACP000112 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ABNET, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2025
$8.2M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood-based biomarkers for gastric cancer risk stratification could facilitate targeting screening to people who will benefit from it most. The ABC Method, which stratifies individuals by their Helicobacter pylori infection and serum-diagnosed chronic atrophic gastritis status, is currently used in Japan for this purpose. Most gastric cancers are caused by chronic H. pylori infection, but few studies have explored the capability of antibody response to H. pylori proteins to predict gastric cancer risk in addition to established predictors.

methodsWe used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) to build a predictive model of noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma risk from serum data on pepsinogen and antibody response to 13 H. pylori antigens as well as demographic and lifestyle factors from a large international study in East Asia.

resultsOur best model had a significantly (P < 0.001) higher AUC of 73.79% [95% confidence interval (CI), 70.86%-76.73%] than the ABC Method (68.75%; 95% CI, 65.91%-71.58%). At 75% specificity, the new model had greater sensitivity than the ABC Method (58.67% vs. 52.68%) as well as NPV (68.24% vs. 66.29%).

conclusionsAlong with serologically defined chronic atrophic gastritis, antibody response to the H. pylori proteins HP 0305, HP 1564, and UreA can improve the prediction of gastric cancer risk. IMPACT: The new risk stratification model could help target more invasive gastric screening resources to individuals at high risk.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaGastritis, AtrophicHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriStomach NeoplasmsAntibody FormationHumansPepsinogen ARisk FactorsPepsinogen A

Identifiers

PMID35131882
PMCPMC8983566
OpenAlexW4210876088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.