Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131837›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Experience-based investigation and codesign of approaches to prevent and reduce Mental Health Act use (CO-PACT): a protocol.

Roisin Mooney, Karen Newbigging, Rose McCabe, Paul McCrone, Kristoffer Halvorsrud, Raghu Raghavan, Doreen Joseph, Kamaldeep Bhui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Roisin MooneyCHiMES Collborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK roisin.mooney@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5792-3314
Karen NewbiggingCHiMES Collborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8764-528X
Rose McCabeSchool of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-7383
Paul McCroneInstitute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7001-4502
Kristoffer HalvorsrudNIHR ARC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8813-0939
Raghu RaghavanSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3346-0877
Doreen JosephCHiMES Collborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kamaldeep BhuiCHiMES Collborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9205-2144
University of Oxford · GBCity, University of London · GBDe Montfort University · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Greenwich · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Independent Review of the Mental Health Act (MHA) in England and Wales confirmed increasing levels of compulsory detentions, especially for racialised communities. This research aims to: (a) understand the causes of and propose preventive opportunities to reduce the disproportionate use of the MHA, (b) use an adapted form of experience-based codesign (EBCD) to facilitate system-wide changes and (c) foreground the voices of service users at risk of detention to radically reform policy and implement new legislation to ensure the principles of equity are retained. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a qualitative study, using a comparative case study design. This study is composed of five work packages; photovoice workshops will be conducted in eight local systems with service users and healthcare professionals separately (WP1); a series of three EBCD workshops in each local system to develop approaches that reduce detentions and improve the experience of people from racialised communities. This will inform a comparative analysis and national knowledge exchange workshop (WP2); an evaluation led by the patient and public involvement group to better understand what it is like for people to participate in photovoice, codesign and participatory research (WP3); an economic evaluation (WP4) and dissemination strategy (WP5). The impact of the involvement of patients and public will be independently evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is sponsored by the University of Oxford and granted ethical approval from the NHS Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (21/SC/0204). The outputs from this study will be shared through several local and national channels.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMental HealthCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative Researchhealth policymental healthprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID35131837
PMCPMC8823141
OpenAlexW4210873150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.