Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131836›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Development, deployment and evaluation of digitally enabled, remote, supported rehabilitation for people with long COVID-19 (Living With COVID-19 Recovery): protocol for a mixed-methods study.

Elizabeth Murray, Henry Goodfellow, Julia Bindman, Ann Blandford, Katherine Bradbury, Tahreem Chaudhry, Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes, Manuel Gomes, Fiona L Hamilton, Melissa Heightman and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Exosomal miR-145 and miR-885 Regulate Thrombosis in COVID-19.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth MurrayResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK elizabeth.murray@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8932-3695
Henry GoodfellowDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0979-2839
Julia BindmanResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Ann BlandfordUCLIC, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3198-7122
Katherine BradburyPsychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Tahreem ChaudhryDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Delmiro Fernandez-ReyesComputer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5070-9198
Manuel GomesDepartment for Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Fiona L HamiltonResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Melissa HeightmanRespiratory Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
William HenleyInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
John R HurstAcademic Unit of Respiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7246-6040
Hannah HyltonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Stuart LinkeCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paul PfefferDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
William RickettsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-0744
Chris RobsonLiving With, London, UK.
Richa SinghDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Fiona A StevensonResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah WalkerInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Jonathan WaywellLiving With, London, UK.
University College London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBLiving Streets · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust · GBDepartment of Health and Social Care · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR132243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLong COVID-19 is a distressing, disabling and heterogeneous syndrome often causing severe functional impairment. Predominant symptoms include fatigue, cognitive impairment ('brain fog'), breathlessness and anxiety or depression. These symptoms are amenable to rehabilitation delivered by skilled healthcare professionals, but COVID-19 has put severe strain on healthcare systems. This study aims to explore whether digitally enabled, remotely supported rehabilitation for people with long COVID-19 can enable healthcare systems to provide high quality care to large numbers of patients within the available resources. Specific objectives are to (1) develop and refine a digital health intervention (DHI) that supports patient assessment, monitoring and remote rehabilitation; (2) develop implementation models that support sustainable deployment at scale; (3) evaluate the impact of the DHI on recovery trajectories and (4) identify and mitigate health inequalities due to the digital divide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Mixed-methods, theoretically informed, single-arm prospective study, combining methods drawn from engineering/computer science with those from biomedicine. There are four work packages (WP), one for each objective. WP1 focuses on identifying user requirements and iteratively developing the intervention to meet them; WP2 combines qualitative data from users with learning from implementation science and normalisation process theory, to promote adoption, scale-up, spread and sustainability of the intervention; WP3 uses quantitative demographic, clinical and resource use data collected by the DHI to determine illness trajectories and how these are affected by use of the DHI; while WP4 focuses on identifying and mitigating health inequalities and overarches the other three WPs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval obtained from East Midlands - Derby Research Ethics Committee (reference 288199). Our dissemination strategy targets three audiences: (1) Policy makers, Health service managers and clinicians responsible for delivering long COVID-19 services; (2) patients and the public; (3) academics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Research Registry number: researchregistry6173.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19health policyrehabilitation medicinetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35131836
PMCPMC8822541
OpenAlexW4210850813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.