Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131834›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Effects of actual and imagined music-cued gait training on motor functioning and brain activity in people with multiple sclerosis: protocol of a randomised parallel multicentre trial.

Barbara Seebacher, Birgit Helmlinger, Daniela Pinter, Rainer Ehling, Harald Hegen, Stefan Ropele, Gernot Reishofer, Christian Enzinger, Christian Brenneis, Florian Deisenhammer

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara SeebacherClinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria barbara.seebacher@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-5699-9077
Birgit HelmlingerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Daniela PinterDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Rainer EhlingKarl Landsteiner Institute for Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Research, Münster, Austria.
Harald HegenClinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan RopeleDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gernot ReishoferDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Christian EnzingerDepartment of Neurology; Division of Neuroradiology; Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Christian BrenneisKarl Landsteiner Institute for Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Research, Münster, Austria.
Florian DeisenhammerClinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATKarl Landsteiner Society · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMotor imagery (MI) refers to the mental rehearsal of a physical action without muscular activity. Our previous studies showed that MI combined with rhythmic-auditory cues improved walking, fatigue and quality of life (QoL) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Largest improvements were seen after music and verbally cued MI. It is unclear whether actual cued gait training achieves similar effects on walking as cued MI in pwMS. Furthermore, in pwMS it is unknown whether any of these interventions leads to changes in brain activation. The purpose of this study is therefore to compare the effects of imagined and actual cued gait training and a combination thereof on walking, brain activation patterns, fatigue, cognitive and emotional functioning in pwMS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective double-blind randomised parallel multicentre trial will be conducted in 132 pwMS with mild to moderate disability. Randomised into three groups, participants will receive music, metronome and verbal cueing, plus MI of walking (1), MI combined with actual gait training (2) or actual gait training (3) for 30 min, 4× per week for 4 weeks. Supported by weekly phone calls, participants will practise at home, guided by recorded instructions. Primary endpoints will be walking speed (Timed 25-Foot Walk) and distance (2 min Walk Test). Secondary endpoints will be brain activation patterns, fatigue, QoL, MI ability, anxiety, depression, cognitive functioning, music-induced motivation-to-move, pleasure, arousal and self-efficacy. Data will be collected at baseline, postintervention and 3-month follow-up. MRI reference values will be generated using 15 matched healthy controls. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study follows the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-PRO Extension. Ethical approval was received from the Ethics Committees of the Medical Universities of Innsbruck (1347/2020) and Graz (33-056 ex 20/21), Austria. Results will be disseminated via national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00023978.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMusicBrainCuesFatigueGaitHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWalkingWalking Speedmultiple sclerosisneurologyrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID35131834
PMCPMC8823210
OpenAlexW4210890133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.