Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131827›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among indigenous populations of the Brazilian Amazon: a cross-sectional study.

Carlos Neandro Cordeiro Lima, Isabella Nogueira Abreu, Eliene Putira Sacuena Rodrigues, Vanessa de Oliveira Freitas, Bruno José Sarmento Botelho, Sandra Lima Souza, Izaura Cayres-Vallinoto, João Farias Guerreiro, Ricardo Ishak, Antonio C R Vallinoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Socioecology and Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Quilombolas Living in the Brazilian Amazon.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos Neandro Cordeiro LimaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.
Isabella Nogueira AbreuInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.
Eliene Putira Sacuena RodriguesInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.
Vanessa de Oliveira FreitasInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.
Bruno José Sarmento BotelhoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-9350
Sandra Lima SouzaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.
Izaura Cayres-VallinotoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.
João Farias GuerreiroInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.
Ricardo IshakInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.
Antonio C R VallinotoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil vallinoto@ufpa.br.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-6507
Universidade Federal do Pará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and its pandemic spread generated serious concern about the impact of the infection on vulnerable indigenous populations of the Brazilian Amazon. Thus, this study aimed to perform a seroepidemiological survey of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in those populations.

settingSix indigenous ethnic groups living in the State of Pará (Northern Brazil) were investigated. The villages of Xikrin do Bacajá, Assurini, Araweté, Parakanã, Munduruku and Kararaô were visited from October 2020 to January 2021. DESIGN AND

participantsWe performed a cross-sectional study to investigate the prevalence of anti-spike (S1) IgG antibodies. Plasma was tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies using two assays (a lateral flow rapid test and an ELISA). A total of 1185 individuals of both sexes were enrolled in the study.

resultsThe prevalences of IgM and IgG antibodies were 6.9% and 68.1%, respectively, ranging from 0% to 79.6%, with significant differences (p<0.001) between age groups in three communities (Araweté, Xikrin and Munduruku) and a virulence rate of 0.86%. The overall IgG prevalence obtained by rapid tests and ELISAs were similar, and the agreement of the results between the two tests was 80%, which was classified as good (kappa=0.4987; p<0.001; sensitivity of 82.1% and specificity of 71.6%). Herd immunity was probably attained, similar to that found in other communities of the Amazon.

conclusionsSARS-CoV-2 spread rapidly among the indigenous populations investigated, but it had a low mortality rate. It is necessary to expand serological investigations to other communities in the Amazon region of Brazil.

Indexed as

COVID-19Indigenous PeoplesAntibodies, ViralBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19epidemiologyinfectious diseases

Identifiers

PMID35131827
PMCPMC8822535
OpenAlexW4210906303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.