Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131740›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open quality2022

Promoting patient and nurse safety: testing a behavioural health intervention in a learning healthcare system: results of the DEMEANOR pragmatic, cluster, cross-over trial.

Michele Hasselblad, Jay Morrison, Ruth Kleinpell, Reagan Buie, Deborah Ariosto, Erin Hardiman, Stephen W Osborn, Samuel K Nwosu, Christopher Lindsell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03777241 (Disruptive bEhavior manageMEnt ANd Prevention in Hospitalized Patients Using a behaviORal Intervention Team), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03777241 nacompletednot on this map

Disruptive bEhavior manageMEnt ANd Prevention in Hospitalized Patients Using a behaviORal Intervention Team: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic, Cluster, Cross-over Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled3,800ConditionsBehavioral ProblemArmsBehavioral Intervention Team, Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A workplace violence prevention program targeting high-risk patients in emergency departments.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michele HasselbladVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jay MorrisonVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Ruth KleinpellVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee, USA ruth.kleinpell@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0142-7527
Reagan BuieVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Deborah AriostoVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Erin HardimanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Stephen W OsbornVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Samuel K NwosuVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Christopher LindsellVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on clinical staff safety within a learning healthcare system, the purpose of this study was to test an innovative model of care for addressing disruptive behaviour in hospitalised patients to determine whether it should be scaled up at the system level.

methodsThe Disruptive bEhaviour manageMEnt ANd prevention in hospitalised patients using a behaviOuRal (DEMEANOR) intervention team was a pragmatic, cluster, cross-over trial. A behavioural intervention team (BIT) with a psychiatric mental health advanced practice nurse and a social worker, with psychiatrist consultation, switched between units each month and occurrences of disruptive behaviours (eg, documented violence control measures, violence risk) compared. Nursing surveys assessed self-perceived efficacy and comfort managing disruptive patient behaviour.

resultsA total of 3800 patients hospitalised on the two units met the criteria for inclusion. Of those, 1841 (48.4%) were exposed to the BIT intervention and 1959 (51.6%) were in the control group. A total of 11 132 individual behavioural issues associated with 203 patient encounters were documented. There were no differences in the use of behavioural interventions, violence risk or injurious behaviour or sitter use between patients exposed to BIT and those in the control group. Tracking these data did rely on nursing documentation of such events. Nurses (82 pre and 48 post) rated BIT as the most beneficial support they received to manage patients exhibiting disruptive, threatening or acting out behaviour.

conclusionsThe BIT intervention was perceived as beneficial by nurses in preparing them to provide care for patients exhibiting disruptive, threatening or acting out behaviour, but documented patient behaviour was not observed to change. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03777241.

Indexed as

Learning Health SystemPsychiatryBehavior TherapyCross-Over StudiesHumansSurveys and Questionnairescluster trialsnursespatient safetysafety culture

Identifiers

PMID35131740
PMCPMC8823076
OpenAlexW4210905983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.