ArticleEpilepsy research2022
A flurothyl-induced seizure does not disrupt hippocampal memory reconsolidation in C57BL/6 J mice.
Article in Epilepsy research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neocortical and cerebellar malformations affect flurothyl-induced seizures in female C57BL/6J mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Memory deficits are a prevalent and pervasive comorbidity of epilepsy that significantly decrease an individual's quality of life. Numerous studies have investigated the effects of a seizure on the encoding process of memory; however, few studies have assessed the effect of a seizure on the reconsolidation process of memory. We investigated how a single seizure affects memory reconsolidation in C57BL/6 J adult mice using a predominately hippocampal-dependent paradigm. Mice were presented with a tone (conditioned stimulus), that was proceeded by a mild shock (unconditioned stimulus) occurring 20 s after the tone. Three days later, a flurothyl-induced seizure was administered 1-h before a memory reconsolidation trial. The learned association was assessed by presenting a conditioned stimulus in a new context 24 h or 1-week after memory reconsolidation. We found that there were no differences in memory present between seizure and control mice at the 24 h or 1-week timepoints. Wheel running was also assessed to ensure that the seizure did not alter locomotion and bias the measure in the memory task. No differences in locomotion between seizure and control mice were observed at any timepoint. Altogether, these findings suggest that hippocampal dependent memory reconsolidation is resistant to flurothyl-induced seizure disruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.