Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131691›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy research2022

A flurothyl-induced seizure does not disrupt hippocampal memory reconsolidation in C57BL/6 J mice.

Matthew S Binder, Zachary J Prankse, Andrew D Kim, Samantha L Hodges, David A Narvaiz, Paige D Womble, Joaquin N Lugo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew S BinderDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Zachary J PrankseDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Andrew D KimDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Samantha L HodgesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
David A NarvaizDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Paige D WombleDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Joaquin N LugoDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA; Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA; Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA. Electronic address: joaquin_lugo@baylor.edu.
Baylor University · US

Funding

Signaling Mechanisms Underlying Epilepsy and Autism CormorbidityR15NS088776 · NINDS · BAYLOR UNIVERSITY · PI JOAQUIN N LUGO · 2015 to 2026
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS088776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory deficits are a prevalent and pervasive comorbidity of epilepsy that significantly decrease an individual's quality of life. Numerous studies have investigated the effects of a seizure on the encoding process of memory; however, few studies have assessed the effect of a seizure on the reconsolidation process of memory. We investigated how a single seizure affects memory reconsolidation in C57BL/6 J adult mice using a predominately hippocampal-dependent paradigm. Mice were presented with a tone (conditioned stimulus), that was proceeded by a mild shock (unconditioned stimulus) occurring 20 s after the tone. Three days later, a flurothyl-induced seizure was administered 1-h before a memory reconsolidation trial. The learned association was assessed by presenting a conditioned stimulus in a new context 24 h or 1-week after memory reconsolidation. We found that there were no differences in memory present between seizure and control mice at the 24 h or 1-week timepoints. Wheel running was also assessed to ensure that the seizure did not alter locomotion and bias the measure in the memory task. No differences in locomotion between seizure and control mice were observed at any timepoint. Altogether, these findings suggest that hippocampal dependent memory reconsolidation is resistant to flurothyl-induced seizure disruption.

Indexed as

FearFlurothylAnimalsHippocampusMemoryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivityQuality of LifeSeizuresFlurothylEpilepsyFreezingReconsolidationSeizureTrace fear conditioning

Identifiers

PMID35131691
PMCPMC12990199
OpenAlexW4205329300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.