Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131587›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2022

An international survey examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telehealth use among mental health professionals.

Madeline I Montoya, Cary S Kogan, Tahilia J Rebello, Karolina Sadowska, José A Garcia-Pacheco, Brigitte Khoury, Maya Kulygina, Chihiro Matsumoto, Rebeca Robles, Jingjing Huang and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Survey of Telemedicine Use by Doctors in District Hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Through the Lens: Telepsychotherapy and the Working Alliance.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2022
    Article
  16. Determinants of Telehealth Service Use among Mental Health Patients: A Case of Rural Louisiana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Telepsychiatry in Australia: A Scoping Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 17 institutions in 11 countries.

Madeline I MontoyaSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Pvt., Vanier Building, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Cary S KoganSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Pvt., Vanier Building, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada. Electronic address: ckogan@uottawa.ca.
Tahilia J RebelloDepartments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Karolina SadowskaDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
José A Garcia-PachecoCentro de Investigación y Docencia Económica, Mexico City, Mexico.
Brigitte KhouryDepartment of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Maya KulyginaTraining and Research Centre, Mental-health clinic No.1 named after N.A. Alekseev, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Chihiro MatsumotoJapanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology, Tokyo, Japan.
Rebeca RoblesCenter for Global Mental Health Research, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jingjing HuangShanghai Mental Health Center and Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Howard F AndrewsDepartments of Biostatistics and Psychiatry, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
José Luis Ayuso-MateosDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Keith DennyDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Wolfgang GaebelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Oye GurejeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Shigenobu KanbaKyushu University, Fukuoka and Japan Depression Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Karen MaréNeuroscience Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
María Elena Medina-MoraFaculty of Psychology, National Autonomous University of Mexico and Center for Global Mental Health Research, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramn de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico.
Kathleen M PikeDepartments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michael C RobertsClinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Pratap SharanDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Dan J SteinSAMRC Unit on Risk and Resilience on Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, South Africa.
T Scott StroupDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Min ZhaoShanghai Mental Health Center and Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Geoffrey M ReedDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Ottawa · CAAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LBCarleton University · CACentro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas · MXHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz · MXKyushu University · JPNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has profoundly affected the work of mental health professionals with many transitioning to telehealth to comply with public health measures. This large international study examined the impact of the pandemic on mental health clinicians' telehealth use.

methodsThis survey study was conducted with mental health professionals, primarily psychiatrists and psychologists, registered with WHO's Global Clinical Practice Network (GCPN). 1206 clinicians from 100 countries completed the telehealth section of the online survey in one of six languages between June 4 and July 7, 2020. Participants were asked about their use, training (i.e., aspects of telehealth addressed), perceptions, and concerns. OUTCOMES: Since the pandemic onset, 1092 (90.5%) clinicians reported to have started or increased their telehealth services. Telephone and videoconferencing were the most common modalities. 592 (49.1%) participants indicated that they had not received any training. Clinicians with no training or training that only addressed a single aspect of telehealth practice were more likely to perceive their services as somewhat ineffective than those with training that addressed two or more aspects. Most clinicians indicated positive perceptions of effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Quality of care compared to in-person services and technical issues were the most common concerns. Findings varied by WHO region, country income level, and profession.

interpretationFindings suggest a global practice change with providers perceiving telehealth as a viable option for mental health care. Increasing local training opportunities and efforts to address clinical and technological concerns is important for meeting ongoing demands.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthPandemicsGlobal mental healthMental health professionalsTelehealthTelemedicineWorld health organization global clinical practice network

Identifiers

PMID35131587
PMCPMC8799380
OpenAlexW4210801987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.