Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131410›Full record

ArticleAnnals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology2022

Aspirin desensitization and biologics in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: Efficacy, tolerability, and patient experience.

Jyotsna Mullur, Camille M Steger, Deborah Gakpo, Jillian C Bensko, Rie Maurer, Tanya M Laidlaw, Kathleen M Buchheit

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Efficacy of Biologics in NSAID-ERD: United Airways From the Nose to the Bronchi.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Biologic Therapies across Nasal Polyp Subtypes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Should Biologics Be Used Before Aspirin Desensitization in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease?The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: Updates in the era of biologics.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2023
    Review
  13. Co-treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease with dupilumab and aspirin therapy after desensitization.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jyotsna MullurDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Camille M StegerCenter for Clinical Investigation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deborah GakpoDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jillian C BenskoDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rie MaurerCenter for Clinical Investigation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tanya M LaidlawDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathleen M BuchheitDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: kbuchheit@bwh.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Therapeutic Control of Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory DiseaseU19AI095219 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Maria Gutierrez-Arcelus · 2011 to 2026
$29.1M
IMMUNOLOGIC BASIS OF RESISTANCE AND HYPERSENSITIVITYT32AI007306 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Nora Amanda Barrett, Joshua A Boyce · 1985 to 2026
$12.2M
Prostaglandin D2: A Key Mediator of Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory DiseaseR01HL128241 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LAIDLAW, TANYA MARIA · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
The Role of IL-5 and Local Nasal Polyp Immunoglobulin Production in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory DiseaseK23AI139352 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BUCHHEIT, KATHLEEN MARY · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128241NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI139352NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007306NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI095219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatterns of medication use and efficacy in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) have not been well characterized, especially since the advent of respiratory biologics. Aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) is efficacious for upper and lower respiratory symptoms for patients with AERD, though aspirin-related adverse effects can limit therapy. The optimal coordination of ATAD and respiratory biologics for the treatment of AERD remains unclear.

objectiveWe aimed to characterize patterns of medication use and treatment experience with biologics and ATAD in AERD.

methodsWe surveyed 98 patients with AERD recruited from the Brigham and Women's Hospital AERD registry. Patients completed an online questionnaire describing their medication history and treatment experience.

resultsA total of 52 (53.0%) patients reported a history of use of one or more respiratory biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, or dupilumab), and 84 (85.7%) reported undergoing aspirin desensitization. There were 24 patients (24.4%) who reported concurrent use of a biologic and ATAD. Compared with those taking ATAD alone, patients taking a biologic and ATAD concurrently were less likely to report that aspirin was effective for their AERD symptoms (odds ratio, 0.161 [95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.76]; P =.02). Whereas patients reported varying efficacy with biologics, dupilumab had the highest odds of patients reporting it worked "very well" (odds ratio, 17.58 [95% confidence interval, 5.68-54.35]; P < .001).

conclusionBiologics are emerging as a treatment option for AERD and are generally well tolerated. Biologic efficacy in AERD is variable by agent, though most patients taking dupilumab found it to be effective. Patients on a biologic in conjunction with ATAD may represent a more severe subset of AERD for which ATAD alone is insufficient.

Indexed as

Asthma, Aspirin-InducedBiological ProductsSinusitisAspirinDesensitization, ImmunologicFemaleHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentAspirinBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID35131410
PMCPMC9058196
OpenAlexW4210267731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.