Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131289›Full record

ArticleContraception2022

Exploring the impact of mifepristone's risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) on the integration of medication abortion into US family medicine primary care clinics✰,✰✰.

Na'amah Razon, Sarah Wulf, Citlali Perez, Sarah McNeil, Lisa Maldonado, Alison Byrne Fields, Diana Carvajal, Rachel Logan, Christine Dehlendorf

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Facilitating Abortion Services in Primary Care Settings After the Loss of Federal Protections.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Telemedicine, Medication Abortion, and Access AfterAmerican journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Primary Care Clinicians' Interest In, and Barriers To, Medication Abortion.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Na'amah RazonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, United States. Electronic address: nrazon@ucdavis.edu.
Sarah WulfPerson-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Citlali PerezPerson-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sarah McNeilDepartments of Family Medicine and Ob/Gyn, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Medical Director, Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare, Martinez, CA, United States.
Lisa MaldonadoReproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY, United States.
Alison Byrne FieldsAggregate, Seattle, WA, United States.
Diana CarvajalDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland, Director of DEIA and Strategic Planning, National RHEDI Program, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Rachel LoganPerson-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Christine DehlendorfPerson-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
University of California, San Francisco · USContra Costa Regional Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Development and Testing of a Point-of-Care Shared Decision-Making Tool for ProvidersK23HD096056 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CARVAJAL, DIANA N · 2019 to 2023
$812k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD096056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn 2000, the United States' Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved mifepristone for medication abortion. In this article, we explore how the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) criteria for mifepristone specifically impede family physicians' ability to provide medication abortion in primary care settings. STUDY

designWe conducted 56 qualitative interviews with a national sample of family physicians across the US who were not opposed to abortion. We examined how the REMS criteria for mifepristone impact family physicians' ability to provide medication abortion.

resultsOf the 56 interviews conducted, 23 participants (41%) raised the REMS criteria as a barrier to providing medication abortion in primary care. These participants reported the REMS added a layer of bureaucratic complexity that made it difficult for family physicians to navigate, even when trained, to provide abortion care. These family physicians described 2 predominant ways the REMS impede their ability to provide medication abortion: (1) The REMS require substantial involvement of clinic administration, who can be unsupportive; (2) The complexity of navigating the REMS results in physicians and clinic administration in primary care viewing medication abortion as not worth the effort, since it is only a small component of services offered in primary care.

conclusionRemoving the REMS could simplify integration of medication abortion into primary care, which could meet patient preferences, improve access, and reduce abortion stigma. The FDA's revised REMS criteria may ease administrative burden but will likely maintain key barriers to integrating medication abortion into family physicians' practice. IMPLICATIONS: Our study highlights that the REMS criteria are barriers to family physicians' ability to integrate medication abortion into their primary care practices. The FDA's removal of in person dispensing criteria may provide some impetus for trained family physicians to integrate medication abortion into their scope of practice but the revised REMS criteria maintain key barriers to broader adoption.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMifepristonePregnancyPrimary Health CareRisk Evaluation and MitigationUnited StatesMifepristoneFamily medicineMedication abortionMifepristonePrimary careREMS

Identifiers

PMID35131289
PMCPMC9018589
OpenAlexW4210588658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.