ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2022
Virtual Education for Patient Self-Testing for Warfarin Therapy Is Effective During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05973240 (Multiphase Research to Develop a Self-report Measure of the Preparedness for Self-Monitoring and Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multiphase Research to Develop a Self-report Measure of the Preparedness for Self-Monitoring and Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation in Adults (The PERSONAE Project)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of Warfarin Home INR Monitoring vs Office-Based Monitoring: a Retrospective Claims-Based Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Patient Care Extra-Aedificium: The Time is Now.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrior to the COVID-19 pandemic, warfarin users were required to complete in-person training in order to participate in approved international normalized ratio (INR) patient self-testing (PST) programs. To minimize in-person contact during the pandemic, a federal waiver of the in-person training requirement allowed new patients to begin PST after completing virtual training. However, it was uncertain whether such patients achieved comparable levels of INR control to patients receiving in-person training.
methodsINR results for patients receiving virtual training upon PST commencement between April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, were compared to those of patients initiating PST with in-person training between April 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was the difference in warfarin time in therapeutic range (TTR) between the groups, with secondary outcomes including differences in the percentages of INR values within individually prescribed INR range and of critical INR values.
resultsThe records of 33,683 patients were included in the analysis (13,568 in the "In-Person" sample; 20,115 in the "Virtual" sample). Patients in the Virtual sample achieved a TTR of 66.78%, compared to the In-Person sample (64.19%; absolute difference 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.50-2.68, p < 0.001). The TTR values were also statistically significantly higher in all subgroups evaluated across categories of patient age, gender, geography, and indication. Similarly favorable results were achieved for INR values in range and critical values.
conclusionVirtual education for PST for warfarin therapy is effective and should continue to be an option for patients and providers throughout the pandemic, and possibly beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.