Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35131112›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery2022

Cost Assessment of Plating Versus Tension Band Wiring Constructs for Treating Mayo Type 2A Olecranon Fractures.

Jesse N Steadman, Andrew R Stephens, Chong Zhang, Angela P Presson, Nikolas H Kazmers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hand surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Revision Olecranon Fixation: Is Tension Band Wiring the Solution? A Case Series and Review of the Literature.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Review
  6. Value driven outcome (VDO) assessment for the treatment of olecranon fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesse N SteadmanUniversity of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Andrew R StephensUniversity of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Chong ZhangDivision of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Angela P PressonDivision of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Nikolas H KazmersDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: nkazmers@gmail.com.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTension band wiring (TBW) or plating may be used for fixation with similar clinical outcomes for adults with displaced Mayo 2A olecranon fractures. The primary hypothesis is that total direct costs (TDCs) for surgery are lower for TBW than plating. Our secondary hypothesis is that combined surgical TDCs are lower for TBW even with a 100% rate of subsequent tension band hardware removal and a 0% rate of plate removal.

methodsPatients who underwent TBW or plating of an isolated unilateral Mayo 2A olecranon fracture between July 2011 and January 2020 at a single academic medical center were identified. Then, TDC for each surgery on plate fixation, TBW, and hardware removal was obtained and converted to 2020 US dollars using information technology cost tools provided by our institution. Finally, relative TDCs were compared between plate fixation and TBW groups using univariate and multivariable generalized estimating equations with log-link.

resultsOf the 97 included patients, the mean age was 50 ± 21 years, and 48% were female. Tension band wiring and plate fixation were performed on 18% (17/97) and 82% (80/97) of male and female patients, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups, although the finding that plate fixation cost 2.6 times that of TBW within the index surgery was significant in the multivariable model, independent of potential confounders (coefficient 2.55, 95% confidence interval: 2.09-3.10). Additionally, mean TDC remained significantly greater for plate fixation even under the hypothetical situation where 100% TBW were removed, and the plate removal rate was 0% (cost difference 181%).

conclusionsUsing TBW relative to plate fixation may improve the cost of care for operative Mayo 2A olecranon fractures. Furthermore, this finding was robust to the rate of hardware removal. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analyses III.

Indexed as

Elbow JointOlecranon ProcessUlna FracturesAdultAgedBone PlatesBone WiresFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesOlecranon fractureplate fixationtension band wiringtotal direct cost

Identifiers

PMID35131112
PMCPMC8995360
OpenAlexW4210438590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.