ArticleMolecular cancer2022
Dual CRISPR interference and activation for targeted reactivation of X-linked endogenous FOXP3 in human breast cancer cells.
Article in Molecular cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combinatorial and Inducible CRISPRa/i Enables Canalized hiPSC Forward Programming and Iterative RefinementbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Inducible CRISPR/Cas systems in precision oncology: Current applications and future perspectives.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- CRISPR Interference to Inhibit Oncogenes for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- From pathogenesis to therapy: the emerging role of regulatory T cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Biomarker-driven neoadjuvant immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: emerging therapeutic targets FOXP3 and WT1.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Reversing transgene silencing via targeted chromatin editing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- CRISPR/dCas9-TET1-mediated epigenetic editing reactivates miR-200c in breast cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Role of Long Non-Coding RNA X-Inactive-Specific Transcript (Non-coding RNA · 2025Article
- Bidirectional epigenetic editing reveals hierarchies in gene regulation.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Sex bias in tumor immunity: insights from immune cells.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Development of artificial transcription factors and their applications in cell reprograming, genetic screen, and disease treatment.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Review
- SE-lncRNAs in Cancer: Classification, Subcellular Localisation, Function and Corresponding TFs.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Radiomics Features on Enhanced Computed Tomography Predict FOXP3 Expression and Clinical Prognosis in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- CRISPR-based dissection of microRNA-23a ~ 27a ~ 24-2 cluster functionality in hepatocellular carcinoma.Oncogene · 2024Article
- Research Progress on the Role of Epigenetic Methylation Modification in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2024Review
- TET Enzymes and 5hmC Levels in Carcinogenesis and Progression of Breast Cancer: Potential Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- CRISPR/dCas9 Tools: Epigenetic Mechanism and Application in Gene Transcriptional Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- CRISPR applications in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2023Review
- Progress and Perspective of CRISPR-Cas9 Technology in Translational Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnlike autosomal tumor suppressors, X-linked tumor suppressors can be inactivated by a single hit due to X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). Here, we argue that targeted reactivation of the non-mutated allele from XCI offers a potential therapy for female breast cancers.
methodsTowards this goal, we developed a dual CRISPR interference and activation (CRISPRi/a) approach for simultaneously silencing and reactivating multiple X-linked genes using two orthogonal, nuclease-deficient CRISPR/Cas9 (dCas9) proteins.
resultsUsing Streptococcus pyogenes dCas9-KRAB for silencing XIST and Staphylococcus aureus dCas9-VPR for activating FOXP3, we achieved CRISPR activation of FOXP3 in various cell lines of human female breast cancers. In human breast cancer HCC202 cells, which express a synonymous heterozygous mutation in the coding region of FOXP3, simultaneous silencing of XIST from XCI led to enhanced and prolonged FOXP3 activation. Also, reactivation of endogenous FOXP3 in breast cancer cells by CRISPRi/a inhibited tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. We further optimized CRISPRa by fusing dCas9 to the demethylase TET1 and observed enhanced FOXP3 activation. Analysis of the conserved CpG-rich region of FOXP3 intron 1 confirmed that CRISPRi/a-mediated simultaneous FOXP3 activation and XIST silencing were accompanied by elevated H4 acetylation, including H4K5ac, H4K8ac, and H4K16ac, and H3K4me3 and lower DNA methylation. This indicates that CRISPRi/a targeting to XIST and FOXP3 loci alters their transcription and their nearby epigenetic modifications.
conclusionsThe simultaneous activation and repression of the X-linked, endogenous FOXP3 and XIST from XCI offers a useful research tool and a potential therapeutic for female breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.