Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130905›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2022

Occupation and prostate Cancer risk: results from the epidemiological study of prostate cancer (EPICAP).

Wendy Bijoux, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Soumaya Balbolia, Pierre-Jean Lamy, Xavier Rebillard, Brigitte Tretarre, Sylvie Cenee, Florence Menegaux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Association of occupational heat exposure and colorectal cancer in the MCC-Spain study.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy BijouxUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm, Villejuif, France.
Emilie Cordina-DuvergerUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm, Villejuif, France.
Soumaya BalboliaUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm, Villejuif, France.
Pierre-Jean LamyInstitut médical d'Analyse Génomique-Imagenome, Labosud, Montpellier, France.
Xavier RebillardService Urologie, Clinique Beau Soleil, Montpellier, France.
Brigitte TretarreRegistre des Tumeurs de l'Hérault, EA 2415, Montpellier, ICM, France.
Sylvie CeneeUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm, Villejuif, France.
Florence MenegauxUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm, Villejuif, France. florence.menegaux@inserm.fr.
Clinique du Millénaire · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRCEA Le Ripault · FRCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent male cancer in industrialized countries, little is known about its aetiology. The literature has suggested an influence of the environment, including occupational exposures, but results are inconsistent. In this context, we investigated PCa risk associated to employment among several occupations using data from EPICAP study.

methodsEPICAP is a French population-based case-control study including 819 PCa incident cases and 879 controls frequency-matched on age. In-person interviews gathered data on potential risk factors and lifetime occupational histories for each job held at least 6 months. Then, occupations were coded using ISCO 68. Unconditional logistic regressions were performed to assess the association between occupations (ever occupied and by duration) and PCa risk, whether all and aggressive, after adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsFor ≥10 years of employment, we found positive associations with PCa, whether overall and aggressive, among Medical, Dental and Veterinary workers (OR (odds ratios) =5.01 [95% confidence interval] [1.27; 19.77]), Members of the armed forces (OR = 5.14 [0.99; 26.71]) and Fishermen, hunters and related workers (OR = 4.58 [1.33; 15.78]); whether overall and non-aggressive PCa, among Legislative officials and Government administrators (OR = 3.30 [1.10; 9.84]) or Managers (OR = 1.68 [1.18; 2.41]); however a negative association, whether overall and non-aggressive PCa, among Material-Handling and Related Equipment Operators, Dockers and Freight Handlers (OR = 0.40 [0.17; 0.97]).

conclusionExcess PCa risks were observed in the EPICAP study mostly among white collar workers exposed to several factors in their work environment. These emerging associations can be used to lead future research investigating specific occupational exposures.

Indexed as

Aggressive prostate cancerCase-control studyOccupationProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35130905
PMCPMC8819870
OpenAlexW4210395680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.