Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130900›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2022

Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution.

Juan Pedro M Camacho, Josefa Cabrero, María Dolores López-León, María Martín-Peciña, Francisco Perfectti, Manuel A Garrido-Ramos, Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cross-species incompatibilities offer new insights into the functional consequences of satellite DNA evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Satellite DNA evolution in two holocentric species of Edessa true bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) with unusually high heterochromatin abundance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cytogenomics of Myloplus tiete reveals conserved satellite DNAs since the Late Eocene in Serrasalmidae (Teleostei, Characiformes).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Divergence and conservation of satellite DNA in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta): a comparative cytogenomic analysis.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Emergence of satellite DNAs suggests centromeric repositioning as a driver of karyotypic variation of the freshwater darter characines (Apareiodon affinis).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. From minor loci to major players? Satellite DNA diversification in Crepis sensu stricto.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Centromeres drive and take a break.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan Pedro M CamachoDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Josefa CabreroDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
María Dolores López-LeónDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
María Martín-PeciñaDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Francisco PerfecttiDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Manuel A Garrido-RamosDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Francisco J Ruiz-RuanoDepartment of Organismal Biology - Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden. francisco.ruiz-ruano@ebc.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-301X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe full catalog of satellite DNA (satDNA) within a same genome constitutes the satellitome. The Library Hypothesis predicts that satDNA in relative species reflects that in their common ancestor, but the evolutionary mechanisms and pathways of satDNA evolution have never been analyzed for full satellitomes. We compare here the satellitomes of two Oedipodine grasshoppers (Locusta migratoria and Oedaleus decorus) which shared their most recent common ancestor about 22.8 Ma ago.

resultsWe found that about one third of their satDNA families (near 60 in every species) showed sequence homology and were grouped into 12 orthologous superfamilies. The turnover rate of consensus sequences was extremely variable among the 20 orthologous family pairs analyzed in both species. The satDNAs shared by both species showed poor association with sequence signatures and motives frequently argued as functional, except for short inverted repeats allowing short dyad symmetries and non-B DNA conformations. Orthologous satDNAs frequently showed different FISH patterns at both intra- and interspecific levels. We defined indices of homogenization and degeneration and quantified the level of incomplete library sorting between species.

conclusionsOur analyses revealed that satDNA degenerates through point mutation and homogenizes through partial turnovers caused by massive tandem duplications (the so-called satDNA amplification). Remarkably, satDNA amplification increases homogenization, at intragenomic level, and diversification between species, thus constituting the basis for concerted evolution. We suggest a model of satDNA evolution by means of recursive cycles of amplification and degeneration, leading to mostly contingent evolutionary pathways where concerted evolution emerges promptly after lineages split.

Indexed as

DNA, SatelliteGrasshoppersAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGene LibraryHumansPhylogenyDNA, SatelliteCytogenomicsLibrary HypothesisSatellite DNASatellitome Evolution

Identifiers

PMID35130900
PMCPMC8822648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.