Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130883›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2022

Ionotropic receptors in the turnip moth Agrotis segetum respond to repellent medium-chain fatty acids.

Xiao-Qing Hou, Dan-Dan Zhang, Daniel Powell, Hong-Lei Wang, Martin N Andersson, Christer Löfstedt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Noses on the wing: the olfactory capacity of hawkmoth wings.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Hawkmoths can smell with grooming organs on their legs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-Wide Identification and Evolutionary Analysis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterization of Ionotropic Receptor GenePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiao-Qing Hou *Department of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Dan-Dan Zhang *Department of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Daniel PowellDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Hong-Lei WangDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Martin N AnderssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Christer LöfstedtDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden. christer.lofstedt@biol.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-3116-6922
Lund University · SEUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn insects, airborne chemical signals are mainly detected by two receptor families, odorant receptors (ORs) and ionotropic receptors (IRs). Functions of ORs have been intensively investigated in Diptera and Lepidoptera, while the functions and evolution of the more ancient IR family remain largely unexplored beyond Diptera.

resultsHere, we identified a repertoire of 26 IRs from transcriptomes of female and male antennae, and ovipositors in the moth Agrotis segetum. We observed that a large clade formed by IR75p and IR75q expansions is closely related to the acid-sensing IRs identified in Diptera. We functionally assayed each of the five AsegIRs from this clade using Xenopus oocytes and found that two receptors responded to the tested ligands. AsegIR75p.1 responded to several compounds but hexanoic acid was revealed to be the primary ligand, and AsegIR75q.1 responded primarily to octanoic acid, and less so to nonanoic acid. It has been reported that the C

conclusionsOur results significantly expand the current knowledge of the insect IR family. Based on the functional data in combination with phylogenetic analysis, we propose that subfunctionalization after gene duplication plays an important role in the evolution of ligand specificities of the acid-sensing IRs in Lepidoptera.

Indexed as

Brassica napusDipteraMothsReceptors, OdorantAnimalsArthropod AntennaeCaprylatesFemaleInsect ProteinsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLigandsMalePhylogenyCaprylatesInsect ProteinsLigandsReceptors, OdorantAcid-sensingFluorescence in situ hybridizationGene expressionLepidopteraOctanoic acidRepellentXenopus oocytes

Identifiers

PMID35130883
PMCPMC8822749
OpenAlexW4226137114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.