Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130867›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

Determining target populations for leprosy prophylactic interventions: a hotspot analysis in Indonesia.

A T Taal, D J Blok, A Handito, S Wibowo, Sumarsono, A Wardana, G Pontororing, D F Sari, W H van Brakel, J H Richardus and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

A T TaalNLR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.taal@nlrinternational.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2387-6297
D J BlokDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A HanditoDepartment of Infectious Disease, Leprosy Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
S WibowoEast Java Provincial Health Office, Surabaya, Indonesia.
SumarsonoEast Java Provincial Health Office, Surabaya, Indonesia.
A WardanaNLR Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
G PontororingNLR Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
D F SariNLR Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
W H van BrakelNLR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J H Richardus *Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
C R S Prakoeswa *Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Erasmus MC · NLAirlangga University · IDMinistry of Health · IDNetherlands Aerospace Centre · NLNetherlands Leprosy Relief · NL

Funding

Dutch Postcode Lottery
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy incidence remained at around 200,000 new cases globally for the last decade. Current strategies to reduce the number of new patients include early detection and providing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to at-risk populations. Because leprosy is distributed unevenly, it is crucial to identify high-risk clusters of leprosy cases for targeting interventions. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) methodology can be used to optimize leprosy control activities by identifying clustering of leprosy cases and determining optimal target populations for PEP.

methodsThe geolocations of leprosy cases registered from 2014 to 2018 in Pasuruan and Pamekasan (Indonesia) were collected and tested for spatial autocorrelation with the Moran's I statistic. We did a hotspot analysis using the Heatmap tool of QGIS to identify clusters of leprosy cases in both areas. Fifteen cluster settings were compared, varying the heatmap radius (i.e., 500 m, 1000 m, 1500 m, 2000 m, or 2500 m) and the density of clustering (low, moderate, and high). For each cluster setting, we calculated the number of cases in clusters, the size of the cluster (km

resultsThe distribution of cases was more focused in Pasuruan (Moran's I = 0.44) than in Pamekasan (0.27). The proportion of total cases within identified clusters increased with heatmap radius and ranged from 3% to almost 100% in both areas. The proportion of the population in clusters targeted for PEP decreased with heatmap radius from > 100% to 5% in high and from 88 to 3% in moderate and low density clusters. We have developed an example of a practical guideline to determine optimal cluster settings based on a given PEP strategy, distribution of cases, resources available, and proportion of population targeted for PEP.

conclusionPolicy and operational decisions related to leprosy control programs can be guided by a hotspot analysis which aid in identifying high-risk clusters and estimating the number of people targeted for prophylactic interventions.

Indexed as

LeprosyCluster AnalysisHumansIncidenceIndonesiaPost-Exposure ProphylaxisSpatial AnalysisGeospatialHotspotsLeprosyPost-exposure prophylaxisTargeted interventions

Identifiers

PMID35130867
PMCPMC8822733
OpenAlexW4210825410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.