Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130859›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Rising through the pandemic: a scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

X Cindy Yin, Michelle Pang, Madelyn P Law, Fiona Guerra, Tracey O'Sullivan, Rachel E Laxer, Brian Schwartz, Yasmin Khan

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

X Cindy YinOntario Agency for Health Promotion and Protection (Public Health Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michelle PangOntario Agency for Health Promotion and Protection (Public Health Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Madelyn P LawDepartment of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Fiona GuerraOntario Agency for Health Promotion and Protection (Public Health Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tracey O'SullivanFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Rachel E LaxerOntario Agency for Health Promotion and Protection (Public Health Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brian SchwartzOntario Agency for Health Promotion and Protection (Public Health Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yasmin KhanOntario Agency for Health Promotion and Protection (Public Health Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada. Yasmin.Khan@oahpp.ca.
Public Health Ontario · CABrock University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR 165870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic generated a growing interest in and need for evidence-based tools to facilitate the implementation of emergency management strategies within public health practice. Quality improvement (QI) is a key framework and philosophy to guide organizational emergency response efforts; however, the nature and extent to which it has been used in public health settings during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unclear.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of literature published January 2020 - February 2021 and focused on the topic of QI at public health agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search was conducted using four bibliographic databases, in addition to a supplementary grey literature search through custom Google search engines and targeted website search methods. Of the 1,878 peer-reviewed articles assessed, 15 records met the inclusion criteria. An additional 11 relevant records were identified during the grey literature search, for a total of 26 records included in the scoping review.

resultsRecords were organized into five topics: 1) collaborative problem solving and analysis with stakeholders; 2) supporting learning and capacity building in QI; 3) learning from past emergencies; 4) implementing QI methods during COVID-19; and 5) evaluating performance using frameworks/indicators.

conclusionsThe literature indicates that QI-oriented activities are occurring at the organizational and program levels to enhance COVID-19 response. To optimize the benefits that QI approaches and methodologies may offer, it is important for public health agencies to focus on both widespread integration of QI as part of an organization's management philosophy and culture, as well as project level activities at all stages of the emergency management cycle.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansPublic HealthQuality ImprovementSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Emergency managementPerformance measurementPublic healthQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID35130859
PMCPMC8822693
OpenAlexW4226143295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.