Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130558›Full record

ArticleUrologia internationalis2022

Cost-Effectiveness of a Sublingual Bacterial Vaccine for the Prophylaxis of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections.

Pedro Carrión-López, Jesus Martínez-Ruiz, José Miguel Giménez-Bachs, Pedro Jesús Fernández-Anguita, Inmaculada Díaz de Mera-Sánchez Migallón, Oscar Legido-Gómez, Saúl Rico-Marco, Marta Victoria Lorenzo-Sánchez, Antonio Santiago Salinas-Sánchez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologia internationalis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pedro Carrión-LópezDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.
Jesus Martínez-RuizDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.
José Miguel Giménez-BachsDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.
Pedro Jesús Fernández-AnguitaDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.
Inmaculada Díaz de Mera-Sánchez MigallónDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.
Oscar Legido-GómezDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.
Saúl Rico-MarcoDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.
Marta Victoria Lorenzo-SánchezDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.
Antonio Santiago Salinas-SánchezDepartment of Urology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) affect 5-10% of women, resulting in an enormous healthcare and society burden. Uromune® is a polybacterial sublingual vaccine with an excellent clinical benefit in rUTI prophylaxis. This study assesses the impact of sublingual vaccination on healthcare resource use and expenditures associated with this pathology.

methodsA quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest, single center study including women with rUTI and vaccinated with Uromune® in real-life clinical practice was performed. Variables were the need of healthcare resources, collected prospectively during two follow-up years, and the rUTI-associated expenditure, calculated using the micro-costing methodology; these were compared before and after vaccination.

resultsA total of 166 women {mean (standard deviation [SD]) urinary tract infection episodes/year 6.19 (2.15)} were included. After vaccination, annual consultations with a primary care physician (PCP) (43.9%), emergency room visits (71.8%), urinary analysis (90.0%), and ultrasound exams (35.6%) decreased compared to pre-vaccination (all p < 0.001). Per patient consumption in antibiotics, PCP consultations, emergency room visits, and complementary exams significantly decreased (all p < 0.02), resulting in a reduction in healthcare expenditure per patient/year from mean (SD) 1,001.1 (655.0) to 497.1 (444.4) EUR.

conclusionSublingual bacterial vaccination with Uromune® decreased healthcare resource use and associated expenditure in women with rUTI, representing an optimal strategy to reduce rUTI-associated healthcare and economic burden.

Indexed as

Urinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial VaccinesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansRecurrenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial VaccinesDirect costsHealthcare resourcesRecurrent urinary tract infectionsSublingual vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35130558
PMCPMC9393836
OpenAlexW4210841216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.