Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130495›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2022

Metastasis and Mortality in Men With Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.

P Travis Courtney, Rishi Deka, Nikhil V Kotha, Daniel R Cherry, Mia A Salans, Tyler J Nelson, Abhishek Kumar, Elaine Luterstein, Anthony T Yip, Vinit Nalawade and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P Travis Courtney1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Rishi Deka1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Nikhil V Kotha1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Daniel R Cherry1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Mia A Salans1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Tyler J Nelson1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Abhishek Kumar1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Elaine Luterstein1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Anthony T Yip2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
Vinit Nalawade2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
J Kellogg Parsons1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
A Karim Kader1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Tyler F Stewart1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
Brent S Rose1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
UC San Diego Health System · USJanssen (Belgium) · BEVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteTL1TR001443 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEPP, COLIN A. · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001443NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActive surveillance (AS) is a safe treatment option for men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer. However, the safety of AS for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer remains unclear. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe identified men with NCCN-classified low-risk and favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and initially managed with AS in the Veterans Health Administration. We analyzed progression to definitive treatment, metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality using cumulative incidences and multivariable competing-risks regression.

resultsThe cohort included 9,733 men, of whom 1,007 (10.3%) had intermediate-risk disease (773 [76.8%] favorable, 234 [23.2%] unfavorable), followed for a median of 7.6 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of metastasis was significantly higher for patients with favorable (9.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%-12.5%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (19.2%; 95% CI, 13.4%-25.9%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.5%; 95% CI, 1.2%-1.9%). The 10-year cumulative incidence of PCSM was also significantly higher for patients with favorable (3.7%; 95% CI, 2.3%-5.7%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (11.8%; 95% CI, 6.8%-18.4%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.8%-1.4%). In multivariable competing-risks regression, favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk patients had significantly increased risks of metastasis and PCSM compared with low-risk patients (all P<.001).

conclusionsCompared with low-risk patients, those with favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with AS are at increased risk of metastasis and PCSM. AS may be an appropriate option for carefully selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, though identification of appropriate candidates and AS protocols should be tested in future prospective studies.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleProstateRiskWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID35130495
PMCPMC10399925
OpenAlexW4210802557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.