Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130362›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2022

Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus.

Elof Eriksson, Paul Y Liu, Gregory S Schultz, Manuela M Martins-Green, Rica Tanaka, Dot Weir, Lisa J Gould, David G Armstrong, Gary W Gibbons, Randy Wolcott and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 174 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
33.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 344 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Therapeutic Approach of Whole-Body Vibration Exercise on Wound Healing in Animal Models: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Elof ErikssonHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2514-1646
Paul Y LiuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Gregory S SchultzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Institute for Wound Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FA, USA.
Manuela M Martins-GreenDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, Laboratory of Wound Healing Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8485-326X
Rica TanakaJuntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Dot WeirSaratoga Hospital Center for Wound Healing and Hyperbaric Medicine, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA.
Lisa J GouldDepartment of Surgery, South Shore Hospital, South Weymouth, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-4679
David G ArmstrongKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gary W GibbonsBoston University School of Medicine, Center for Wound Healing South Shore Health, Weymouth, MA, USA.
Randy WolcottSouthwest Regional WCC, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Oluyinka O OlutoyeCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Robert S KirsnerDr Philip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FA, USA.
Geoffrey C GurtnerStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6118-7161
Boston University · USBrown University · USHarvard University · USJuntendo University · JPNationwide Children's Hospital · USPalo Alto University · USSaratoga Hospital · USSouth Shore Hospital · USSouthwest Regional Wound Care Center · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Improving the science of adherence reinforcement and safe mobility in people with diabetic foot ulcers using smart offloadingR01DK124789 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARMSTRONG, DAVID GEORGE, NAJAFI, BIJAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK124789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wound Healing Foundation (WHF) recognised a need for an unbiased consensus on the best treatment of chronic wounds. A panel of 13 experts were invited to a virtual meeting which took place on 27 March 2021. The proceedings were organised in the sub-sections diagnosis, debridement, infection control, dressings, grafting, pain management, oxygen treatment, outcomes and future needs. Eighty percent or better concurrence among the panellists was considered a consensus. A large number of critical questions were discussed and agreed upon. Important takeaways included that wound care needs to be simplified to a point that it can be delivered by the patient or the patient's family. Another one was that telemonitoring, which has proved very useful during the COVID-19 pandemic, can help reduce the frequency of interventions by a visiting nurse or a wound care center. Defining patient expectations is critical to designing a successful treatment. Patient outcomes might include wound specific outcomes such as time to heal, wound size reduction, as well as improvement in quality of life. For those patients with expectations of healing, an aggressive approach to achieve that goal is recommended. When healing is not an expectation, such as in patients receiving palliative wound care, outcomes might include pain reduction, exudate management, odour management and/or other quality of life benefits to wound care.

Indexed as

Wound HealingHumansQuality of Lifearterialchronicpressuretreatment consensusvenouswounds

Identifiers

PMID35130362
PMCPMC9305950
OpenAlexW4210835131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.