Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130318›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Pregnant women's perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine: A French survey.

Charles Egloff, Camille Couffignal, Anne Gael Cordier, Philippe Deruelle, Jeanne Sibiude, Olivia Anselem, Alexandra Benachi, Dominique Luton, Laurent Mandelbrot, Christelle Vauloup-Fellous and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acceptance of the COVID-19 Vaccine Among Postpartum Women in Five Countries.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance of Pregnant Women in Thailand.International journal of women's health · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charles EgloffAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris APHP, Nord, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.
Camille CouffignalFHU PREMA, Paris, France.
Anne Gael CordierUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1193, Villejuif, France.
Philippe DeruellePôle de gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jeanne SibiudeAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris APHP, Nord, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.
Olivia AnselemMaternité Port-Royal, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Alexandra BenachiUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1193, Villejuif, France.
Dominique LutonUniversité de Paris, Paris, France.
Laurent MandelbrotAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris APHP, Nord, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5883-7597
Christelle Vauloup-FellousUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1193, Villejuif, France.
Alexandre J VivantiUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1193, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-0047
Olivier PiconeAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris APHP, Nord, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8421-9971
Inserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPregnant women are at increased risk for COVID-19, and COVID-19 vaccine is the most promising solution to overcome the current pandemic. This study was conducted to evaluate pregnant women's perceptions and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. MATERIALS &

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from February 18 to April 5 2021. An anonymous survey was distributed in 7 French obstetrics departments to all pregnant women before a prenatal visit. All pregnant women attending a follow-up consultation were asked to participate in the study. An anonymous web survey was available through a QR code and participants were asked whether or not they would agree to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, and why. The questionnaire included questions on the patients' demographics and their knowledge of COVID-19 vaccines.

resultsOf the 664 pregnant women who completed the questionnaire, 29.5% (95% CI 27.7; 31.3) indicated they would agree to be vaccinated against COVID-19. The main reason for not agreeing was being more afraid of potential side effects of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on the fetus than of COVID-19. Factors influencing acceptance of vaccination were: being slightly older, multiparity, having discussed it with a caregiver and acceptance of the influenza vaccine. DISCUSSION: Nearly one-third of pregnant women in this population would be willing to be vaccinated. In addition to studies establishing fetal safety, public health agencies and healthcare professionals should provide accurate information about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdultCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35130318
PMCPMC8820613
OpenAlexW4210791148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.