Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130305›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Perceptions of cervical cancer and motivation for screening among women in Rural Lilongwe, Malawi: A qualitative study.

Agatha K Bula, Fan Lee, John Chapola, Clement Mapanje, Mercy Tsidya, Annie Thom, Jennifer H Tang, Lameck Chinula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Agatha K BulaUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0001-8440-7059
Fan LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
John ChapolaUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-6499
Clement MapanjeUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Mercy TsidyaUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Annie ThomUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jennifer H TangUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0003-4238-2791
Lameck ChinulaUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Funding

Fogarty Global Health Fellows Coordinating CenterR25TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.9M
Project 3U54CA190152 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAMANIA, BLOSSOM A, GOPAL, SATISH · 2014 to 2019
$4.2M
UNC Global Women’s Health FellowshipT32HD075731 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2013 to 2024
$2.4M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009340NCI NIH HHS U54 CA190152NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD075731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women in Malawi. Low awareness of cervical cancer and negative perceptions of screening can prevent women from participating in preventative strategies. We sought to explore perceptions and motivations for screening among women who participated in a cervical cancer screen-and-treat pilot study in rural Malawi. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a qualitative sub-study of a community-based cervical cancer screen-and-treat pilot study in rural Lilongwe between July-August 2017. From October 2017-February 2018, 17 women who underwent screening using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and same-day thermal ablation treatment were recruited at their 12-week follow-up visit post treatment to participate in this qualitative sub-study. Semi-structured interview guides that explored baseline knowledge of cervical cancer, perceptions, and motivation for screening were used for in-depth interviews (IDIs). IDIs were conducted in the local language, Chichewa, translated and transcribed to English. Data was analyzed using NVivo® V12.0.

resultsFindings included fatalistic views on cancer, but limited knowledge specific to cervical cancer. Misconceptions of cervical cancer screening were common; however, there was a unique understanding of screening as prevention (i.e., finding and treating early disease to prevent progression to worsening disease). This understanding appeared to stem from HIV prevention concepts known to the community. Motivations for screening included desire to know one's health status, convenience of community-based screening, and peer encouragement.

conclusionDespite limited knowledge of cervical cancer and misconceptions of screening, the concept of screening for prevention, desire to know one's health status, convenient access, and peers' influence were motivators for participation in screening. Cervical cancer screen-and-treat programs in high HIV prevalence areas should consider utilizing language that parallels HIV prevention language to communicate the need for cervical cancer screening and treatment and utilize prevention concepts that may already be familiar to women living there.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMotivationQualitative ResearchRural PopulationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMalawiMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerceptionPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID35130305
PMCPMC8820632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.