Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130273›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

INTEGRATE: Model-based multi-omics data integration to characterize multi-level metabolic regulation.

Marzia Di Filippo, Dario Pescini, Bruno Giovanni Galuzzi, Marcella Bonanomi, Daniela Gaglio, Eleonora Mangano, Clarissa Consolandi, Lilia Alberghina, Marco Vanoni, Chiara Damiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. COBRAxy: constraint-based metabolic modeling in Galaxy.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Genome-scale knockout simulation and clustering analysis of drug-resistant breast cancer cells reveal drug sensitization targets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Genome-scale models in human metabologenomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marzia Di FilippoDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7428-0522
Dario PesciniDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-4823
Bruno Giovanni GaluzziISBE/SYSBIO Centre of Systems Biology, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8518-5352
Marcella BonanomiISBE/SYSBIO Centre of Systems Biology, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0886-7613
Daniela GaglioISBE/SYSBIO Centre of Systems Biology, Milan, Italy.
Eleonora ManganoInstitute for Biomedical Technologies (ITB), National Research Council (CNR), Segrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4040-4654
Clarissa ConsolandiInstitute for Biomedical Technologies (ITB), National Research Council (CNR), Segrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-9557
Lilia AlberghinaISBE/SYSBIO Centre of Systems Biology, Milan, Italy.
Marco VanoniISBE/SYSBIO Centre of Systems Biology, Milan, Italy.
Chiara DamianiISBE/SYSBIO Centre of Systems Biology, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-8302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolism is directly and indirectly fine-tuned by a complex web of interacting regulatory mechanisms that fall into two major classes. On the one hand, the expression level of the catalyzing enzyme sets the maximal theoretical flux level (i.e., the net rate of the reaction) for each enzyme-controlled reaction. On the other hand, metabolic regulation controls the metabolic flux through the interactions of metabolites (substrates, cofactors, allosteric modulators) with the responsible enzyme. High-throughput data, such as metabolomics and transcriptomics data, if analyzed separately, do not accurately characterize the hierarchical regulation of metabolism outlined above. They must be integrated to disassemble the interdependence between different regulatory layers controlling metabolism. To this aim, we propose INTEGRATE, a computational pipeline that integrates metabolomics and transcriptomics data, using constraint-based stoichiometric metabolic models as a scaffold. We compute differential reaction expression from transcriptomics data and use constraint-based modeling to predict if the differential expression of metabolic enzymes directly originates differences in metabolic fluxes. In parallel, we use metabolomics to predict how differences in substrate availability translate into differences in metabolic fluxes. We discriminate fluxes regulated at the metabolic and/or gene expression level by intersecting these two output datasets. We demonstrate the pipeline using a set of immortalized normal and cancer breast cell lines. In a clinical setting, knowing the regulatory level at which a given metabolic reaction is controlled will be valuable to inform targeted, truly personalized therapies in cancer patients.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomicsProteomicsTranscriptomeBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansProof of Concept Study

Identifiers

PMID35130273
PMCPMC8853556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.