Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35129882›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2022

Urban landscape and infection risk in free-roaming cats.

Mónica G Candela, Angela Fanelli, João Carvalho, Emmanuel Serrano, Guillermo Domenech, Francisco Alonso, Carlos Martínez-Carrasco

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathogens Associated with Domestic Cats (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exposure of Wild Ruminants toVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and risk factors of cats in the Budapest area.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Emergence Potential ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mónica G CandelaDepartment of Animal Health, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7314-9808
Angela FanelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Valenzano, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8204-1230
João CarvalhoDepartment of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Emmanuel SerranoWildlife Ecology & Health group (WE&H) and Servei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Guillermo DomenechDepartment of Food Technology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Francisco AlonsoDepartment of Animal Health, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Carlos Martínez-CarrascoDepartment of Animal Health, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Universidad de Murcia · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Aveiro · PTUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite public concern on the role of free-roaming cats as reservoirs of zoonotic agents, little is known about the influence of urban and peri-urban landscapes on the exposure risk. We evaluated the seroprevalence of three zoonotic agents (Chlamydia felis, Coxiella burnetii and Toxoplasma gondii) in domestic cats (Felis catus). Two hundred and ninety-one free-roaming cats were trapped in Murcia municipality (Southeast Spain), and their sera were tested for specific antibodies against T. gondii using a modified agglutination test (MAT), and for C. felis, C. burnetii and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) antibodies with ELISA technique. Pathogen seroprevalence at 95% CI was calculated for each sex and age category (up to and over 12 months) and compared with a chi-squared test. The role of human population density and urban landscape characteristics on the risk of pathogen exposure in the cat population was explored using generalized linear models. Seropositivity against a single pathogen was found in 60% of the cats, while 19% was seropositive for two or three pathogens. Seroprevalence of C. felis was 8% (CI

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalAgglutination TestsAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanCatsChlamydiaRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ProtozoanChlamydia felisCoxiella burnetiifree-roaming catgeo-epidemiologylandscape, urbanization, rural areaToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID35129882
PMCPMC9304129
OpenAlexW4210914898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.