Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35129827›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022

Regulatory Flexibilities and Guidances for Addressing the Challenges of COVID-19 in the EU: What Can We Learn from Company Experiences?

Kevin Klein, Pieter Stolk, Pär Tellner, Virginia Acha, Sarah Montagne, Isabelle Stöckert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin KleinExon Consultancy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. kevin@exon-consultancy.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8250-2375
Pieter StolkExon Consultancy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pär TellnerEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), Ixelles, Belgium.
Virginia AchaMSD, London, UK.
Sarah MontagneBayer PLC, Reading, UK.
Isabelle StöckertBayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic required urgency in the development and delivery of effective vaccines and therapeutics; meanwhile, ongoing clinical research, regulation and supply for other much-needed therapeutics and vaccines needed to be sustained. In Europe, the European Commission, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the national regulatory agencies (NRAs) responded by issuing guidance outlining regulatory flexibilities mainly directed at COVID-19 vaccines and, belatedly, therapeutics. Using a survey methodology, this study gathered the views of the R&D based pharmaceutical industry in May-June 2021 on the value of these flexibilities for continued use in the post-pandemic era as well as for future use in health emergency situations. Findings indicate that many flexibilities were foreseen to have value beyond the pandemic, particularly where EU and Member States aligned closely to provide a singular, streamlined regulatory environment. Digitalization was a notable driver of these flexibilities, but innovations in regulatory process (e.g. rolling reviews, flexible Scientific Advice) improved the process and outcomes measurably. Finally, the rapid reaction of the EU regulatory system and extensive efforts by all involved in providing innovative therapeutics and vaccines to patients in need provides learnings for the upcoming overhaul of the pharmaceutical acquis.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDrug IndustryHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesClinical researchCOVID-19PharmacovigilanceQuality and supplyRegulatory flexibilties

Identifiers

PMID35129827
PMCPMC8821789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.