ArticleCardiovascular toxicology2022
Cardiac Expression of Esophageal Cancer-Related Gene-4 is Regulated by Sp1 and is a Potential Early Target of Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.
Article in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging roles of spexin in cardiovascular homeostasis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Ischemic Myocardium Targeting Peptide-Guided Nanobubbles for Multimodal Imaging and Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Decoding post-myocardial infarction coronary microvascular dysfunction: The SP1-driven STAT3/KCa3.1/eNOS protective mechanism.CytoJournal · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram Model for the Risk of Cardiac Death in Patients Treated with Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2023Article
- A potential link between aberrant expression of ECRG4 and atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal Cancer-Related Gene 4 (Ecrg4) expressed in cardiomyocytes and the cardiac conduction system is downregulated during cardiac ischemia and atrial fibrillation. To explore whether Ecrg4 plays any role in doxorubicin (DOX)-induced cardiotoxicity. Rats and neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCMs) were employed to study the effect of DOX on Ecrg4 transcription. Bioinformatics combined with promoter analysis were used to map the rat Ecrg4 promoter. ChIP assay was used to evaluate the binding of Sp1 to the Ecrg4 promoter. Transient transfection was used to study the effect of Sp1 on the expression of endogenous Ecrg4. DOX decreased endogenous Ecrg4 gene expression in the heart and cultured NRCMs. In silico analysis showed that the 5'UTR immediately upstream of the start codon ATG, harbors a putative promoter that is GC-rich, and contains CpG islands, multiple overlapping Sp1sites. Transcription is initiated mainly on the 'C' at - 15. Serial 5'-deletion combined with dual-luciferase assays showed that the rat Ecrg4 core promoter resides at - 1/- 800. Sp1 transactivated Ecrg4 gene, which was almost abolished by DOX. Furthermore, ChIP assay showed that Sp1 specifically bound to the Ecrg4 promoter was interrupted by DOX. Finally, DOX suppressed Sp1 protein expression, and restoration of Sp1 increased Ecrg4 expression that was resistant to DOX-induced Ecrg4 downregulation. Importantly, cardiomyocyte-specific loss of Ecrg4 significantly enriched the differentially expressed proteins in the signaling pathways commonly involved in DOX-induced cardiotoxicity. Our results indicate that Sp1 mediates DOX-induced suppression of Ecrg4, which may contribute indirectly to its cardiotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.