Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35129789›Full record

Trial reportInternal and emergency medicine2022

Drug-related emergency department visits: prevalence and risk factors.

Lisbeth Damlien Nymoen, Malin Björk, Trude Eline Flatebø, Merethe Nilsen, Aasmund Godø, Erik Øie, Kirsten Kilvik Viktil

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Promoting Nordic 'Green Care Practices'.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisbeth Damlien NymoenDiakonhjemmet Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway. lisbetd@student.matnat.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9330-3374
Malin BjörkFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Trude Eline FlatebøDiakonhjemmet Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway.
Merethe NilsenDiakonhjemmet Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway.
Aasmund GodøDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Erik ØieDepartment of Internal Medicine, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kirsten Kilvik ViktilDiakonhjemmet Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway.
Diakonhjemmet Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the prevalence of drug-related emergency department (ED) visits and associated risk factors. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the ED, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. From April 2017 to May 2018, 402 patients allocated to the intervention group in a randomized controlled trial were included in this sub-study. During their ED visit, these patients received medication reconciliation and medication review conducted by study pharmacists, in addition to standard care. Retrospectively, an interdisciplinary team assessed the reconciled drug list and identified drug-related issues alongside demographics, final diagnosis, and laboratory tests for all patients to determine whether their ED visit was drug-related. The study population's median age was 67 years (IQR 27, range 19-96), and patients used a median of 4 regular drugs (IQR 6, range 0-19). In total, 79 (19.7%) patients had a drug-related ED visits, and identified risk factors were increasing age, increasing number of regular drugs and medical referral reason. Adverse effects (72.2%) and non-adherence (16.5%) were the most common causes of drug-related ED visits. Antithrombotic agents were most frequently involved in drug-related ED visits, while immunosuppressants had the highest relative frequency. Only 11.4% of the identified drug-related ED visits were documented by physicians during ED/hospital stay. In the investigated population, 19.7% had a drug-related ED visit, indicating that drug-related ED visits are a major concern. If not recognized and handled, this could be a threat against patient safety. Identified risk factors can be used to identify patients in need of additional attention regarding their drug list during the ED visit.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMedication ReconciliationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHospitalizationHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultDrug-related hospitalizationEmergency departmentsMedication errorsMedication reconciliationMedication review

Identifiers

PMID35129789
PMCPMC9352618
OpenAlexW4210887042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.