Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35129727›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2022

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in molecular subtypes of resectable gastric cancer: a post hoc analysis of the D1/D2 and CRITICS trials.

Hedde D Biesma, Tanya T D Soeratram, Karolina Sikorska, Irene A Caspers, Hendrik F van Essen, Jacqueline M P Egthuijsen, Aart Mookhoek, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Marianne Nordsmark and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Potent therapeutic strategy in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability-high and/or deficient mismatch repair.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of microsatellite instability and HER2 positivity in locally advanced esophago-gastric cancer patients treated with peri-operative chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Hedde D BiesmaDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tanya T D SoeratramDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karolina SikorskaDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Irene A CaspersDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hendrik F van EssenDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline M P EgthuijsenDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aart MookhoekDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark I van Berge HenegouwenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marianne NordsmarkDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Donald L van der PeetDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fabienne A R M WarmerdamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Hospital, Sittard, The Netherlands.
Maud M GeenenDepartment of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olaf J L LoosveldDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Johanneke E A PortieljeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maartje LosDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Daniëlle A M HeidemanDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elma Meershoek-Klein KranenbargDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Henk H HartgrinkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johanna van SandickDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel VerheijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J H van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Annemieke CatsDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bauke YlstraDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole C T van GriekenDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. nct.vangrieken@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9992-0760
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLAarhus University Hospital · DKAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLOLVG · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpstein-Barr virus positivity (EBV+) and microsatellite instability (MSI-high) are positive prognostic factors for survival in resectable gastric cancer (GC). However, benefit of perioperative treatment in patients with MSI-high tumors remains topic of discussion. Here, we present the clinicopathological outcomes of patients with EBV+, MSI-high, and EBV-/MSS GCs who received either surgery only or perioperative treatment.

methodsEBV and MSI status were determined on tumor samples collected from 447 patients treated with surgery only in the D1/D2 trial, and from 451 patients treated perioperatively in the CRITICS trial. Results were correlated to histopathological response, morphological tumor characteristics, and survival.

resultsIn the D1/D2 trial, 5-year cancer-related survival was 65.2% in 47 patients with EBV+, 56.7% in 47 patients with MSI-high, and 47.6% in 353 patients with EBV-/MSS tumors. In the CRITICS trial, 5-year cancer-related survival was 69.8% in 25 patients with EBV+, 51.7% in 27 patients with MSI-high, and 38.6% in 402 patients with EBV-/MSS tumors. Interestingly, all three MSI-high tumors with moderate to complete histopathological response (3/27, 11.1%) had substantial mucinous differentiation. No EBV+ tumors had a mucinous phenotype. 115/402 (28.6%) of EBV-/MSS tumors had moderate to complete histopathological response, of which 23/115 (20.0%) had a mucinous phenotype.

conclusionsIn resectable GC, MSI-high had favorable outcome compared to EBV-/MSS, both in patients treated with surgery only, and in those treated with perioperative chemo(radio)therapy. Substantial histopathological response was restricted to mucinous MSI-high tumors. The mucinous phenotype might be a relevant parameter in future clinical trials for MSI-high patients.

Indexed as

Epstein-Barr Virus InfectionsStomach NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisEpstein–Barr virus (EBV)Histopathological responseMicrosatellite instability (MSI)Mucinous differentiationStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35129727
PMCPMC9013342
OpenAlexW4210541324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.