Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35129624›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Outcomes and lessons learnt from practice of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric setting of various age groups: a global study across 8 centres.

Ee Jean Lim, Olivier Traxer, Yesica Quiroz Madarriaga, Daniele Castellani, Khi Yung Fong, Vinson Wai-Shun Chan, Anna Bujons Tur, Amelia Pietropaolo, Deepak Ragoori, Anil Shrestha and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pediatric Endourology Advances.Current urology reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Ee Jean LimDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. eejeanlim@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-0651
Olivier TraxerDepartment of Urology Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Yesica Quiroz MadarriagaUrology Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniele CastellaniUrology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Khi Yung FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Vinson Wai-Shun ChanSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anna Bujons TurUrology Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Amelia PietropaoloUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Deepak RagooriDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Anil ShresthaDepartment of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kanti Path, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Chandra Mohan VaddiDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Tanuj Paul BhatiaDepartment of Urology, Sarvodaya Hospital Sarvodaya, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Mriganka ManiUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Patrick Juliebø-JonesUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Stephen GriffinUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Esther García RojoDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.
Mariela CorralesDepartment of Urology Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Cagri Akin SekerciDepartment of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yiloren TanidirDepartment of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohDepartment of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBMarmara University · TRSorbonne Université · FRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESAsian Institute of Gastroenterology · INBir Hospital · NPChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHM Hospitales · ESHyderabad Rheumatology Center · INNational University of Singapore · SGNavodaya Dental College and Hospital · INNg Teng Fong General Hospital · SGOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITSingapore General Hospital · SGUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Psychiatric research infrastructure for intervention and implementation in India – TEAMSD43TW009114 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Smita N Deshpande, Mary Elizabeth Hawk · 2014 to 2026
$3.2M
Training Program for Psychiatric Genetics in IndiaD43TW006167 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NIMGAONKAR, VISHWAJIT LAXMIKANT · 2002 to 2006
$1.7M
Tri National Training Program in Psychiatric GeneticsD43TW008302 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MANSOUR, HADER A., NIMGAONKAR, VISHWAJIT LAXMIKANT · 2009 to 2013
$542k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW006167FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008302FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyse and report the practice, outcomes and lessons learnt from a global series of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric multicentre series.

methodsA retrospective review of anonymized pooled data gathered globally from 8 centres in paediatric patients (≤ 18 years of age) who had renal stones and underwent RIRS from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, stone characteristics, complications and stone-free rate (SFR; defined as endoscopically stone free and/or residual fragments < 2 mm on follow up imaging) were analysed. The cohort was stratified into 3 groups by age: < 5 years (Group A), 5-10 years (Group B) and > 10 years (Group C). Overall, post-operative complication rate was 13.7%. Chi-square comparisons were used for categorical variables; analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for continuous variables.

results314 patients were analysed. The mean age was 9.54 ± 4.76 years. Groups A, B and C had 67 (21.3%), 83 (26.4%) and 164 (52.2%) patients, respectively. Mean stone size was 10.7 ± 4.62 mm. Pre-stenting was performed in 155 (49.4%) of patients, ureteral access sheaths (UAS) was used in 54.5% of patients with majority (71%) utilizing holmium laser for stone fragmentation. All complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2). SFR was 75.5%.

conclusionsRIRS is acceptable as a first-line intervention in the paediatric population with reasonable efficacy and low morbidity. Complications are slightly higher in patients < 5 years of age, which should be taken into account while counselling patients.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUreterAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUreteroscopyPaediatricRenal calculiRenal stoneRetrograde intrarenal surgeryUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35129624
PMCPMC13067876
OpenAlexW4210506678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.