Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35129623›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022

[Quality and ethics in healthcare].

Georg Marckmann, Jan Schildmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georg MarckmannInstitut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Lessingstr. 2, 80336, München, Deutschland. marckmann@lmu.de.
Jan SchildmannInstitut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Profilzentrum Gesundheitswissenschaften, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term "quality" in healthcare is frequently used but defined in different ways. On the one hand, quality describes the nature or characteristic of things and is descriptive in this respect. In quality management and quality assurance, however, the focus is on the normative dimension of quality, referring to the evaluation of structures, processes, or results of actions in the context of healthcare. There are several links between ethical considerations in healthcare and quality of healthcare. First, the provision and assurance of high quality is an ethical imperative, mandated by the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. However, for high ethical quality of care, the ethical principles of respect for patient autonomy and justice must also be considered. Last but not least, the determination and justification of what "good" or "high" quality in healthcare means must be reflected from an ethical perspective. This article analyses these ethical dimensions of quality management and quality assurance. To achieve this goal, it first explains which ethical requirements have to be considered as quality criteria in patient care. Subsequently, ethically relevant challenges in determining quality in healthcare are identified based on criteria of outcome quality, and the teaching of professional competencies in medical education is discussed as a possible contribution to quality and quality assurance in healthcare. The paper concludes with considerations on determining and assuring quality under conditions of limited healthcare resources.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomySocial JusticeBeneficenceDelivery of Health CareGermanyHumansEthicsMedical educationMedical professionalismQuality indicatorsResource allocation

Identifiers

PMID35129623
PMCPMC8888467
OpenAlexW4210699707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.