Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35129446›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Participatory Methods for Systems Modeling of Youth Mental Health: Implementation Protocol.

Louise Freebairn, Jo-An Occhipinti, Yun Ju C Song, Adam Skinner, Kenny Lawson, Grace Yeeun Lee, Samuel J Hockey, Samantha Huntley, Ian B Hickie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Developing Best Practices in Co-Production With Lived Experience Experts in Bipolar Research: Insights From the AMBIENT-BD Lived Experience Advisory Panel.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Beyond capacity limits: can social cohesion offset the impact of service constraints on youth mental health?European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Louise Freebairn *Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-870X
Jo-An Occhipinti *Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-1092
Yun Ju C SongBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-6305
Adam SkinnerBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-1506
Kenny LawsonBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9959-2442
Grace Yeeun LeeBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7234-1870
Samuel J HockeyBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8930-6409
Samantha HuntleyBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-5755
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-9895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant investment, mental health issues remain a leading cause of death among young people globally. Sophisticated decision analysis methods are needed to better understand the dynamic and multisector drivers of youth mental health. System modeling can help explore complex issues such as youth mental health and inform strategies to effectively respond to local needs and achieve lasting improvements. The advantages of engaging stakeholders in model development processes have long been recognized; however, the methods for doing so are often not well-described.

objectiveThis paper aims to describe the participatory procedures that will be used to support systems modeling for national multisite implementation. The Right Care, First Time, Where You Live research program will focus on regional youth mental health applications of systems modeling in 8 different sites across Australia.

methodsThe participatory model development approach involves an iterative process of engaging with a range of participants, including people with lived experience of mental health issues. Their knowledge of the local systems, pathways, and drivers is combined with the academic literature and data to populate the models and validate their structure. The process centers around 3 workshops where participants interact and actively engage in group model-building activities to define, refine, and validate the systems models. This paper provides a detailed blueprint for the implementation of this process for mental health applications.

resultsThe participatory modeling methods described in this paper will be implemented at 2 sites per year from 2022 to 2025. The 8 selected sites have been chosen to capture variations in important factors, including determinants of mental health issues and access to services. Site engagement commenced in August 2021, and the first modeling workshops are scheduled to commence in February 2022.

conclusionsMental health system decision makers require tools to help navigate complex environments and leverage interdisciplinary problem-solving. Systems modeling can mobilize data from diverse sources to explore a range of scenarios, including the impact of interventions in different combinations and contexts. Involving stakeholders in the model development process ensures that the model findings are context-relevant and fit-for-purpose to inform decision-making. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/32988.

Indexed as

co-designmental health servicesparticipatory system modelingpublic health systems researchyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID35129446
PMCPMC8861863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.