Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35128816›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2022

Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Total Knee Arthroplasty by Different Surgical Approaches: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Jin-Long Zhao, Ling-Feng Zeng, Jian-Ke Pan, Gui-Hong Liang, He-Tao Huang, Wei-Yi Yang, Ming-Hui Luo, Jun Liu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin-Long ZhaoThe Second School of Clinical Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guagnzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7079-1336
Ling-Feng ZengGuangdong Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Research Team on Bone and Joint Degeneration and Injury, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1311-8641
Jian-Ke PanGuangdong Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Research Team on Bone and Joint Degeneration and Injury, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4596-6111
Gui-Hong LiangGuangdong Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Research Team on Bone and Joint Degeneration and Injury, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-2628
He-Tao HuangThe Second School of Clinical Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guagnzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-1375
Wei-Yi YangGuangdong Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Research Team on Bone and Joint Degeneration and Injury, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8657-2269
Ming-Hui LuoGuangdong Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Research Team on Bone and Joint Degeneration and Injury, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-6317
Jun LiuGuangdong Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Research Team on Bone and Joint Degeneration and Injury, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-3880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this network meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) considering seven different surgical approaches. Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science) were searched for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving TKA with different surgical approaches. STATA 14.0 was used to construct network maps and publication bias graphs and conduct inconsistency tests, network meta-analyses, and surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) calculations. A total of 51 RCTs involving 4061 patients and 4179 knees from 18 countries were included. Among the seven surgical approaches, the midvastus approach (MV) was the top choice to reduce tourniquet use time, the subvastus approach (SV) had the shortest operation time, the mini-midvastus approach (Mini-SV) was associated with the least amount of time to achieve straight leg raise (SLR) after surgery, the mini-medial parapatellar approach (Mini-MP) reduced postoperative pain effects, and the medial parapatellar approach (MP) was the best approach to improve range of motion (ROM). Excluding the quadriceps-sparing approach (QS), which was not compared, the use of the mini-midvastus (Mini-MV) may shorten the hospital stay. There were no significant differences in blood loss, postoperative complications, American Knee Society Score (AKSS) objective, or AKSS functional between the seven surgical approaches (P > 0.05).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansKnee JointRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeNetwork meta-analysisRandomized controlled trialsSurgical approachesTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35128816
PMCPMC8927026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.