Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35128763›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2022

Did the COVID-19 pandemic affect mental health, training progression, and fertility planning of obstetrics and gynecology trainees? A survey of London trainees.

Ayanthi Gunasekera, Lauren Berg, Hashviniya Sekar, Sayantana Patra-Das, Sonji Clarke, Wai Yoong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Study of the Current Scenario of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ayanthi GunasekeraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7147-6685
Lauren BergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
Hashviniya SekarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Barnet General Hospital, Barnet, UK.
Sayantana Patra-DasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.
Sonji ClarkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Wai YoongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7286-5968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of studyTo assess impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental wellbeing, workload, training progression, and fertility planning among London Obstetrics and Gynecology trainees.

designAn anonymous survey comprising 41 peer-validated questions was sent to London trainees. Anxiety and depression were screened using Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire 7 (GAD 7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

resultsOne hundred and seventy-seven trainees completed the questionnaire, of whom 54% were aged 25-34 years, 43% were senior trainees (ST6-7), and 51% classified themselves as Black, Asian, and Minority Asian (BAME). Although the percentage of respondents with "moderate"/"severe" GAD 7 and PHQ-9 scores was two to three times that of UK population estimates, median GAD 7 and PHQ-9 scores were 7 and 6 ("mild"). Sixteen percent deferred their fertility plans and 26% of ST6-7 trainees changed their Advanced Training Skills Modules. Other issues raised ranged from lack of assistance with electronic portfolio, postponement of examinations, poor senior input for mental health, lack of debriefing for redeployed trainees and requests for deferment of annual reviews.

conclusionsThe pandemic has incurred an impact on mental health, training progression, and fertility planning of London trainees. With recommencement of nonemergency consultations and elective gynecology theater, alongside Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Recovery Blueprint to optimize learning opportunities, there is optimism that these challenges can be overcome. Trainers and trainees need to safeguard training opportunities and consider innovative forms of future learning, while anticipating potential effects of subsequent waves.

Indexed as

COVID-19GynecologyObstetricsAdultFemaleFertilityHumansLondonMental HealthPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesanxietyCOVID-19depressionfertilitymental healthobstetrics and gynecology traineestraining progression

Identifiers

PMID35128763
PMCPMC9115236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.