Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35128747›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging2022

Comparison of MRI methods for measuring whole-brain oxygen extraction fraction under different geometric conditions at 7T.

Anna Lundberg, Emelie Lind, Hampus Olsson, Gunther Helms, Linda Knutsson, Ronnie Wirestam

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of MRI methods for measuring whole-brain oxygen extraction fraction under different geometric conditions at 7T.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna LundbergDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Emelie LindDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Hampus OlssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Gunther HelmsDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Linda KnutssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ronnie WirestamDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2628-0760
Lund University · SEJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCerebral tissue oxygenation is a critical brain viability parameter, and the magnetic properties of hemoglobin offer the opportunity to noninvasively quantify oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrahigh-field MRI shows advantages such as increased sensitivity to magnetic susceptibility differences and improved signal-to-noise ratio that can be translated into smaller voxel size, but also increased sensitivity to static and B1 field inhomogeneities. The aim was to produce a systematic comparison of three MRI-based methods for estimation of OEF.

methodsOEF estimates in 16 healthy subjects were obtained at 7T utilizing susceptometry-based oximetry (SBO), quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), and transverse relaxation rate (R2*). Two major draining veins, that is, the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and the straight sinus (SS), were investigated, including mutual agreement between the methods in each of the two different vessels, agreement between vessels as well as potential vessel angle and vessel size dependences.

resultsVery good correlation (r = .88) was found between SBO-based and QSM-based OEF estimates in SSS. Only QSM showed a moderate correlation (r = .61) between corresponding OEF estimates in SSS and SS. For SBO, a trend of increasing OEF estimates was observed as the SS vessel angle relative to the main magnetic field increased. No obvious size dependence could be established for any method. The R2*-based OEF estimates were reasonable (35%-36%), but the observed range was somewhat low.

conclusionThe results indicate that QSM is a promising candidate for assessment of OEF estimates, for example, providing reasonably robust estimates across a wide range of vessel orientations.

Indexed as

Brain MappingOxygenBrainCerebrovascular CirculationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOxygencerebral hemodynamicscerebral oxygenationmagnetic resonance imagingquantitative susceptibility mappingR2* mappingsusceptometry-based oximetryvenous oxygen saturation

Identifiers

PMID35128747
PMCPMC9305937
OpenAlexW4210380738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.