ArticleMedical physics2022
Technical note: Evaluation of a V-Net autosegmentation algorithm for pediatric CT scans: Performance, generalizability, and application to patient-specific CT dosimetry.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully automated artificial intelligence-based coronary CT angiography image processing: efficiency, diagnostic capability, and risk stratification.European radiology · 2024Trial
- Comparison of Auto-Contouring Tools for Delineation of Normal Organs at Risk in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of deep learning on CT-based organ-at-risk delineation for flank irradiation in paediatric renal tumours: a SIOP-RTSG radiotherapy committee study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Modern Imaging Guidelines for 3-D Modeling of Pediatric Solid Tumors: A New Era of Surgical Oncology Operative Planning.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Technical Note: Neural Network Architectures for Self-Supervised Body Part Regression Models with Automated Localized Segmentation Application.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Children Are Not Small Adults: Addressing Limited Generalizability of an Adult Deep Learning CT Organ Segmentation Model to the Pediatric Population.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Pediatric Healthcare: Current Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-powered personalized patient dosimetry in CT.BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Age Encoded Adversarial Learning for Pediatric CT Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automated contouring, treatment planning, and quality assurance for VMAT craniospinal irradiation (VMAT-CSI).Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Pediatric chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis CT images with expert organ contours.Medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study developed and evaluated a fully convolutional network (FCN) for pediatric CT organ segmentation and investigated the generalizability of the FCN across image heterogeneities such as CT scanner model protocols and patient age. We also evaluated the autosegmentation models as part of a software tool for patient-specific CT dose estimation.
methodsA collection of 359 pediatric CT datasets with expert organ contours were used for model development and evaluation. Autosegmentation models were trained for each organ using a modified FCN 3D V-Net. An independent test set of 60 patients was withheld for testing. To evaluate the impact of CT scanner model protocol and patient age heterogeneities, separate models were trained using a subset of scanner model protocols and pediatric age groups. Train and test sets were split to answer questions about the generalizability of pediatric FCN autosegmentation models to unseen age groups and scanner model protocols, as well as the merit of scanner model protocol or age-group-specific models. Finally, the organ contours resulting from the autosegmentation models were applied to patient-specific dose maps to evaluate the impact of segmentation errors on organ dose estimation.
resultsResults demonstrate that the autosegmentation models generalize to CT scanner acquisition and reconstruction methods which were not present in the training dataset. While models are not equally generalizable across age groups, age-group-specific models do not hold any advantage over combining heterogeneous age groups into a single training set. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface distance results are presented for 19 organ structures, for example, median DSC of 0.52 (duodenum), 0.74 (pancreas), 0.92 (stomach), and 0.96 (heart). The FCN models achieve a mean dose error within 5% of expert segmentations for all 19 organs except for the spinal canal, where the mean error was 6.31%.
conclusionsOverall, these results are promising for the adoption of FCN autosegmentation models for pediatric CT, including applications for patient-specific CT dose estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.