Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35128672›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Technical note: Evaluation of a V-Net autosegmentation algorithm for pediatric CT scans: Performance, generalizability, and application to patient-specific CT dosimetry.

Philip M Adamson, Vrunda Bhattbhatt, Sara Principi, Surabhi Beriwal, Linda S Strain, Michael Offe, Adam S Wang, Nghia-Jack Vo, Taly Gilat Schmidt, Petr Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Age Encoded Adversarial Learning for Pediatric CT Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philip M AdamsonVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Vrunda BhattbhattVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Sara PrincipiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Surabhi BeriwalVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Linda S StrainDepartment of Radiology, Children's Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Michael OffeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Adam S WangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Nghia-Jack VoDepartment of Radiology, Children's Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Taly Gilat SchmidtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Petr JordanVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Funding

Software tool for routine, rapid, patient-specific CT organ dose estimationU01EB023822 · NIBIB · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIDT, TALY GILAT, VAN HETEREN, JOHN · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) U01EB023822NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB023822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study developed and evaluated a fully convolutional network (FCN) for pediatric CT organ segmentation and investigated the generalizability of the FCN across image heterogeneities such as CT scanner model protocols and patient age. We also evaluated the autosegmentation models as part of a software tool for patient-specific CT dose estimation.

methodsA collection of 359 pediatric CT datasets with expert organ contours were used for model development and evaluation. Autosegmentation models were trained for each organ using a modified FCN 3D V-Net. An independent test set of 60 patients was withheld for testing. To evaluate the impact of CT scanner model protocol and patient age heterogeneities, separate models were trained using a subset of scanner model protocols and pediatric age groups. Train and test sets were split to answer questions about the generalizability of pediatric FCN autosegmentation models to unseen age groups and scanner model protocols, as well as the merit of scanner model protocol or age-group-specific models. Finally, the organ contours resulting from the autosegmentation models were applied to patient-specific dose maps to evaluate the impact of segmentation errors on organ dose estimation.

resultsResults demonstrate that the autosegmentation models generalize to CT scanner acquisition and reconstruction methods which were not present in the training dataset. While models are not equally generalizable across age groups, age-group-specific models do not hold any advantage over combining heterogeneous age groups into a single training set. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface distance results are presented for 19 organ structures, for example, median DSC of 0.52 (duodenum), 0.74 (pancreas), 0.92 (stomach), and 0.96 (heart). The FCN models achieve a mean dose error within 5% of expert segmentations for all 19 organs except for the spinal canal, where the mean error was 6.31%.

conclusionsOverall, these results are promising for the adoption of FCN autosegmentation models for pediatric CT, including applications for patient-specific CT dose estimation.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsChildHumansRadiometryThoraxdeep learningorgan dosesegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35128672
PMCPMC9007850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.