ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Utilizing shale gas drilling cuttings as admixture in cement mortars: a case study in Fuling, Chongqing, China.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Huge amount of water-based drilling cuttings (WDC) is generated during the drilling and exploitation of shale gas. In this study, WDC powder was used as a replacement of cement at different mass fraction (0, 10%, 30%, and 50%) to prepare cement mortars. The mechanical properties, water absorption, and heavy metals leaching of the mortars were then investigated along with the corresponding microstructures. The results showed that a higher porosity was formed within the WDC-blended mortars. For instance, the porosity of the control specimen was 16.7%, while the porosity increased to 20.6%, 21.4%, and 25.0% for the mortars blended with 10%, 30%, and 50% WDC, respectively. Therefore, the mechanical properties of the mortars decreased and their water absorption increased with the increase of WDC replacement ratio. For example, the compressive strength of the mortars blended with 10% and 30% WDC decreased from 33.11 MPa of the control specimen to 29.33 MPa and 21.48 MPa, respectively. Nevertheless, the blended mortars still satisfied the M20 strength grade according to the Chinese standard (JGJ/T 98-2010). The compressive strength of the mortar blended with 50% WDC was 11.33 MPa and then satisfied the M10 strength grade. The leaching test indicated that the water quality of leachates from the mortars blended with lower than 30% WDC remained as Grade I according to the Chinese standard (GB 3838-2002); the water quality of leachate from the mortar blended with 50% WDC was classified as Grade III, which, however, would not cause a safety issue to the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35128611What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.